henhaobio
Sign in

bioRxivBioinformaticsPreprint

Best Practices for Interpretable Machine Learning in Computational Biology

Valerie CheniD, Muyu YangiD, Wenbo CuiiD, Joon Sik KimiD, Ameet TalwalkariD, Jian MaiD

PDFDOI

Abstract

Advances in machine learning (ML) have enabled the development of next-generation prediction models for complex computational biology problems. These developments have spurred the use of interpretable machine learning (IML) to unveil fundamental biological insights through data-driven knowledge discovery. However, in general, standards and guidelines for IML usage in computational biology have not been well-characterized, representing a major gap toward fully realizing the potential of IML. Here, we introduce a workflow on the best practices for using IML methods to perform knowledge discovery which covers verification strategies that bridge data, prediction model, and explanation. We outline a workflow incorporating these verification strategies to increase an IML methods accountability, reliability, and generalizability. We contextualize our proposed workflow in a series of widely applicable computational biology problems. Together, we provide an extensive workflow with important principles for the appropriate use of IML in computational biology, paving the way for a better mechanistic understanding of ML models and advancing the ability to discover novel biological phenomena.

Citations
14

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISAhlquist '23Aalst '25Eid '21Magnano '22Baek '26Garbulowski '20
62% semantic matchBioinformatics
K. D. Ahlquist, Lauren A. Sugden, Sohini Ramachandran·PLoS Computational Biology·May 26, 2023· 25 citations