Annals of Clinical and Translational NeurologyGeneticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Expert Panel Curation of 31 Genes in Relation to Limb Girdle Muscular Dystrophy
Shruthi MohaniD, Shannon M. McNultyiD, Courtney ThaxtoniD, Marwa ElnagheebiD, Emma Owens, May FlowersiD, Teagan Nunnery, Autumn Self, Brooke Palus, Svetlana GorokhovaiD, April KennedyiD, Zhiyv NiuiD, Mridul JohariiD, Alassane Baneye MaīgaiD, Kelly Macalalad, Amanda R. ClauseiD, Jacques Samuel BeckmanniD, Lucas Bronicki, Sandra T. CooperiD, Vijay S GaneshiD, Peter B. KangiD, Akanchha KesariiD, Monkol LekiD, Jennifer R. Levy, Laura RufibachiD, , Conrad Chris WeihliD
- Citations
- 4
- FWCI
- 0.54
- Field percentile
- top 41%
Abstract
IntroductionLimb girdle muscular dystrophies (LGMDs) are a group of genetically heterogeneous autosomal conditions with some degree of phenotypic homogeneity. LGMD is defined as having onset >2 years of age with progressive proximal weakness, elevated serum creatine kinase levels and dystrophic features on muscle biopsy. Advances in massively parallel sequencing have led to a surge in genes linked to LGMD. MethodsThe ClinGen Muscular Dystrophies and Myopathies gene curation expert panel (MDM GCEP, formerly Limb Girdle Muscular Dystrophy GCEP) convened to evaluate the strength of evidence supporting gene-disease relationships (GDR) using the ClinGen gene-disease clinical validity framework to evaluate 31 genes implicated in LGMD. ResultsThe GDR was exclusively LGMD for 17 genes, whereas an additional 14 genes were related to a broader phenotype encompassing congenital weakness. Four genes (CAPN3, COL6A1, COL6A2, COL6A3) were split into two separate disease entities, based on each displaying both dominant and recessive inheritance patterns, resulting in curation of 35 GDRs. Of these, 30 (86%) were classified as Definitive, 4 (11%) as Moderate and 1 (3%) as Limited. Two genes, POMGNT1 and DAG1, though definitively related to myopathy, currently have insufficient evidence to support a relationship specifically with LGMD. ConclusionsThe expert-reviewed assertions on the clinical validity of genes implicated in LGMDs form an invaluable resource for clinicians and molecular geneticists. We encourage the global neuromuscular community to publish case-level data that help clarify disputed or novel LGMD associations.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Skeletal muscle cells derived from induced pluripotent stem cells: a platform for limb girdle muscular dystrophies.
c. Bruge, M. GEOFFROY, … X. Nissan·bioRxiv·May 8, 2022
- A genome-wide association analysis of loss of ambulation in dystrophinopathy patients suggests multiple candidate modifiers of disease severity
Kevin M. Flanigan, Megan A. Waldrop, … Veronica J. Vieland·European Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Mar 20, 2023
- Inhibition of DNAJ-HSP70 interaction improves strength in muscular dystrophy
R. Bengoechea, A. R. Findlay, … C. C. Weihl·bioRxiv·Jan 3, 2020
- The ClinGen Syndromic Disorders Gene Curation Expert Panel: Assessing the Clinical Validity of 111 Gene-Disease Relationships
Eleanor C Broeren, Vanessa N. Gitau, … Alison J. Coffey·Genetics in Medicine OpenPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2025
- Muscle transcriptome profiling reveals novel molecular pathways and biomarkers in laminin-α2 deficient patients
Veronica Pini, Francesco Catapano, … Francesco Muntoni A·Acta Neuropathologica CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Feb 3, 2026
- DAB2 as a biomarker and mechanistic link between lipid dysregulation and disease progression in LGMD R2
Céline Bruge, Nathalie Bourg, … Xavier Nissan·bioRxiv·Sep 11, 2025