Growing out of the fins: implications of isometric and allometric scaling of morphology relative to increasing mass in blue sharks (Prionace glauca)
S. G. Seamone, P. C. Sternes, T. M. McCaffrey, N. K. Tsao, D. A. Syme
Abstract
Disproportional changes (i.e. allometry) in shark morphology have been attributed to shifts in function associated with niche shifts in life history, such as in habitat and diet. Photographs of blue sharks (Prionace glauca, 26-145 kg) were used to analyze changes in parameters of body and fin morphology with increasing mass that are fundamental to swimming and feeding. We hypothesized that blue sharks would demonstrate proportional changes (i.e. isometry) in morphology with increasing mass because they do not undergo profound changes in prey and habitat type, but as a result, we predicted that blue sharks would grow into bodies with greater turning inertias and smaller frontal and surface areas, in addition to smaller spans and areas of the fins relative to mass. Many aspects of morphology increased with isometry. However, blue sharks demonstrated negative allometry in body density, whereas surface area, volume and roll inertia of the body, area, span and aspect ratio of both dorsal fins, span and aspect ratio of the ventral caudal fin, and span, length and area of the mouth increased with positive allometry. The dataset was divided in half based on mass to form two groups: smaller and larger sharks. Besides area of both dorsal fins, relative to mass, larger sharks had bodies with significantly greater turning inertia and smaller frontal and surface areas, in addition to fins with smaller spans and areas, compared to smaller sharks. Hence, isometric scaling does not necessarily imply functional similarity, and allometric scaling may sometimes be critical in maintaining, rather than shifting, function relative to mass. Both allometric and isometric changes in blue sharks are predicted to promote reduced costs of transport in migration, but conversely, decreased unsteady performance, such as in escape responses. These changes are likely beneficial for larger sharks that probably experience reductions in predation pressure.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Insights into ontogenetic scaling and morphological variation in sharks from near-term brown smooth-hound (Mustelus henlei) embryos
Joel H. Gayford, Phillip C. Sternes, … Darren A. Whitehead·bioRxiv·Feb 5, 2024
- Ecological lifestyle and gill slit height across sharks
W. J. VanderWright, J. S. Bigman, … N. K. Dulvy·bioRxiv·Jan 17, 2024
- Convergent reduction in skeletal density during benthic to pelagic transitions in Baikal sculpins
Brayan A Gutierrez, Olivier Larouche, … Jacob M. Daane·bioRxiv·Jan 23, 2026
- The fish body functions as an airfoil: surface pressures generate thrust during carangiform locomotion
K. N. Lucas, G. V. Lauder, E. D. Tytell·bioRxiv·Feb 20, 2020
- Restoring the True Form of the Gigantic Blue Whale for the First Time, and Mass Estimation
G. S. Paul·bioRxiv·Aug 28, 2022
- Constrained body mass evolution and decoupled morphological rates in plesiosaurs
Ruizhe Jackevan Zhao, Chi Zhang·bioRxiv·Jun 29, 2026