Journal of Cleaner ProductionEcologyPeer-reviewed journal article
The carbon footprint of meat and dairy proteins: a practical perspective to guide low carbon footprint dietary choices
Abstract
Meat and dairy products in the food industry represent a significant portion of anthropogenic green house gas emissions. To meet the Intergovernemental Panel on Climate Change recommendations to limit global warming, these emissions should be reduced. Meat and dairy products are also responsible for the majority of our daily, vital, protein intake. Yet, meat and dairy products contain very different amounts of proteins, making it difficult in general to rationalize which protein source has the lowest carbon footprint. Here we present a practical and pedagogical review, comparing the carbon footprint of a variety of meat and dairy products with respect to their protein content. We investigate the carbon footprint of different dietary choices for several countries, by keeping the total number of meat and dairy proteins constant. Interestingly, we find that dairy-only diets are in general only a little less carbon intensive than current diets. However, 50% carbon footprint reduction may be obtained, throughout the world, with a "low CO2"-tailored diet including only small poultry, eggs and yogurt. Such a dietary pattern suggests easy to follow consumer guidelines for reduced carbon footprint. We report further on a number of consumer oriented questions (local or imported? organic or not? cow or goat milk? hard or soft cheese?). Our methodology may be applied to broader questions, such as the carbon footprint of proteins in general (including fish and plant proteins). We hope our work will drive more studies focusing on consumer-oriented questions.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Carbon footprint of South Dakota dairy production system and assessment of mitigation options
Anna Naranjo, Heidi L. Sieverding, … Ermias Kebreab·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Mar 30, 2023
- Dairy vs. beef production - expert views on welfare
R. Mandel, M. B. M. Bracke, … L. Gygax·bioRxiv·Dec 6, 2021
- Net reductions in greenhouse gas emissions from feed additive use in California dairy cattle
E. Kebreab, X. Feng·bioRxiv·May 26, 2020
- Environmental Impacts of Dry Vegan Dog Food: A Comprehensive UK Analysis
R.A. Brociek, D.S. Gardner·bioRxiv·May 19, 2025
- Rapid global phaseout of animal agriculture has the potential to stabilize greenhouse gas levels for 30 years and offset 68 percent of CO2 emissions this century
M. Eisen, P. O. Brown·bioRxiv·Apr 15, 2021
- Too Close to Eat? Solidarity with Animals, Animal Welfare and Meat Consumption
A. Boaitey, S. Jette Nantel, M. Eden·bioRxiv·Jan 30, 2020