Carbon footprint of South Dakota dairy production system and assessment of mitigation options
Anna NaranjoiD, Heidi L. SieverdingiD, David Clay, Ermias KebreabiD
Abstract
Livestock production contributes to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. However, there is a considerable variability in the carbon footprint associated with livestock production. Site specific estimates of GHG emissions are needed to accurately focus GHG emission reduction efforts. A holistic approach must be taken to assess the full environmental impact of livestock production using appropriate geographical scale. The objective of this study was to determine baseline GHG emissions from dairy production in South Dakota using a life cycle assessment (LCA) approach. A cradle-to-farm gate LCA was used to estimate the GHG emissions to produce 1 kg of energy-and-protein corrected milk (ECM) in South Dakota. The system boundary was divided into feed production, farm management, enteric methane emissions, and manure management as these activities are the main contributors to the overall GHG emissions. The production of 1 kg ECM in South Dakota dairies was estimated to emit 1.21 kg CO2 equivalents. The major contributors were enteric methane emissions (46.3%) and manure management (32.6%). Feed production and farm management made up 13.9 and 7.2 %, respectively. The estimate was similar to the national average but slightly higher than the California dairy system. The source of corn used in the dairies influences the footprint. For example, South Dakota corn had fewer GHG emissions than grain produced in Iowa. Therefore, locally and more sustainably sourced feed input will contribute to further reducing the environmental impacts. Improvements in efficiency of milk production through better genetics, nutrition animal welfare and feed production are expected to further reduce the carbon footprint of South Dakota dairies. Furthermore, use of feed additives and anaerobic digesters will reduce emissions from enteric and manure sources, respectively.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 10
- FWCI
- 1.61
- Field percentile
- top 19%
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Net reductions in greenhouse gas emissions from feed additive use in California dairy cattle
E. Kebreab, X. Feng·bioRxiv·May 26, 2020
- The carbon footprint of meat and dairy proteins: a practical perspective to guide low carbon footprint dietary choices
S. Marbach, R. Gaillac·Journal of Cleaner ProductionPeer-reviewed·Oct 1, 2021
- ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACT OF FIVE METHANE MITIGATING FEED ADDITIVES ON MILK PRODUCTION AND ASSOCIATED PARAMETERS ACROSS MULTIPLE COMMERCIAL DAIRY FARMS
Yaniv Altshuler, Tzruya Calvão Chebach, … Joao Gatica·bioRxiv·Feb 4, 2025
- Rapid global phaseout of animal agriculture has the potential to stabilize greenhouse gas levels for 30 years and offset 68 percent of CO2 emissions this century
M. Eisen, P. O. Brown·PLOS ClimatePeer-reviewed·Feb 1, 2022
- Is apparent digestibility associated with residual feed intake and enteric methane emission in Nellore cattle?
Sarah Bernardes Gianvecchio, L. S. Sakamoto, … Maria Eugênia Zerlotti Mercadante·Revista Brasileira de ZootecniaPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2024
- An integrative review of the impact of ungulates on wetland carbon storage and greenhouse gas emissions
Nadia S. Santini, Edgar J. González, … Catherine E. Lovelock·bioRxiv·Oct 28, 2025