BMC GeneticsGenomicsPeer-reviewed journal article
Relevance of genomic evaluation for egg quality traits in layers
David Picard DruetiD, Amandine Varenne, Florian Herry, Frédéric HeraultiD, Sophie AllaisiD, Thierry Burlot, Pascale Le RoyiD
Abstract
BackgroundGenomic evaluation, based on thousands of genetic markers, has become the standard evaluation methodology in dairy cattle breeding programs over the past few years. Despite the many differences between dairy cattle breeding and poultry breeding, genomic selection seems very promising for the avian sector, and studies are currently being conducted to optimize avian selection schemes. In this optimization perspective, one of the key parameters is to properly predict the accuracy of genomic evaluation in pure line layers.\n\nMethodsBoth genetic evaluation and genomic evaluation were performed on three candidate populations (male and female), using different sizes of phenotypic records on five egg quality traits and at two different ages. The methodologies used were BLUP & ssGBLUP, and variance-covariance matrices were estimated through REML. To estimate evaluation accuracy, the LR method was implemented. Four statistics were used to assess the relative accuracy of the estimated breeding values of candidates, their bias and dispersion, as well as the differences between genetic evaluation and genomic evaluation.\n\nResultsIt was observed that genomic evaluation, whether performed on males or females, always proved more accurate than genetic evaluation. The gain was higher when phenotypic information was narrowed and an augmentation of the size of the reference population led to an increase in accuracy prediction, for what regards genomic evaluation. By taking into account the increase of selection intensity and the decrease of the generation interval induced by genomic selection, the expected annual genetic gain would be higher with ancestry-based genomic evaluation of male candidates than with genetic evaluation based on collaterals. This advantage of genomic selection over genetic selection requires to be studied in more details for female candidates.\n\nConclusionsIn conclusion, in the population studied, genomic evaluation for egg quality traits of breeding birds at birth seems a promising strategy, at least for what regards males selection.
- Citations
- 14
- FWCI
- 1.46
- Field percentile
- top 20%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Genomic selection accuracy and bias using imputed genotypes on growth, welfare and fitness traits in two Pekin duck lines
Oswald Matika, Eirini Tarsani, … Kellie A. Watson·BMC GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Apr 22, 2026
- Comparison of selective genotyping strategies in genomic selection programs for broilers using stochastic simulation
Setegn Worku Alemu, Anders Christian Sørensen, … Just Jensen·bioRxiv·Apr 29, 2022
- Assessment of long-term trends in genetic mean and variance after the introduction of genomic selection in layers: a simulation study
Ivan Pocrnić, Jana Obšteter, … Gregor Gorjanc·Frontiers in GeneticsPeer-reviewed·May 10, 2023
- Plant breeders should be determining economic weights for a selection index instead of using independent culling for choosing parents in breeding programs with genomic selection
Lorena Guimarães Batista, Robert Chris Gaynor, … John M. Hickey·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·May 10, 2021
- Impact of genomic preselection on subsequent genetic evaluations with ssGBLUP - using real data from pigs
Ibrahim Jibrila, Jérémie Vandenplas, … M.P.L. Calus·bioRxiv·Jun 18, 2021
- Detecting effective starting point of genomic selection by divergent trends from BLUP and ssGBLUP in pigs, beef cattle, and broilers
Rostam Abdollahi-Arpanahi, Daniela A. L. Lourenco, I. Misztal·Journal of Animal SciencePeer-reviewed·Aug 14, 2021