Sign in
Evolutionary BiologybioRxiv
Preprint

Bite force transmission and mandible shape in grasshoppers, crickets, and allies is largely dependent on phylogeny, not diet

C. Edel, P. T. Ruehr, M. Frenzel, T. van de Kamp, F. Tomas, J. Hammel, F. Wilde, A. Blanke

Abstract

Although organ systems evolve in response to many intrinsic and extrinsic factors, frequently one factor has a dominating influence. For example, mouthpart shape and mechanics are thought to correlate strongly with aspects of the diet. Within insects, this paradigm of a shape-diet connection is advocated for decades but the relationship has so far never been quantified and is mostly based on qualitative observations. Orthoptera (grasshoppers, crickets, and allies) are a prominent case, for which mandible shape and dietary preference are thought to correlate strongly and even lead to predictions of feeding preferences. Here, we analysed mandible shape, biting efficiency, and their potential correlation with dietary categories in a phylogenetic framework for a broad sampling of several hundred extant Orthoptera covering nearly all families. The mandibular mechanical advantage was used as a descriptor of gnathal edge shape and bite force transmission efficiency. We aimed to understand how mandible shape is linked to biting efficiency and diet, and how these traits are influenced by phylogeny and allometry. The investigation reveals that feeding ecology is not the unequivocal predictor of mandible shape that it was assumed to be. There is a strong phylogenetic signal suggesting that phylogenetic history does have a much more prevalent influence on gnathal edge shape and distal mechanical advantage, than, e.g., feeding guilds or the efficiency of the force transmission to the food. Being ancestrally phytophagous, Orthoptera evolved in an environment with abundant food sources so that selective pressures leading to more specialized mouthpart shapes and force transmission efficiencies were low.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.