Apparent timescaling of fossil diversification rates is caused by sampling bias

Negative scaling relationships between both speciation and extinction rates on the one hand, and the age or duration of organismal groups on the other, are pervasive, and recovered in both molecular phylogenetic and fossil time series. The agreement between molecular and fossil data hints at a universal cause, and potentially to incongruence between micro- and macroevolution. However, the existence of negative rate scaling in fossil time series has not undergone the same level of scrutiny as in molecular data. Here, we analyse the marine fossil record across the last ~538.8 Ma of the Phanerozoic to investigate the presence and strength of negative rate scaling. We find that negative rate scaling arises under commonly applied age range-based per-capita rates, which do not control for sampling bias, but are severely reduced or absent when metrics are used that do correct for sampling. We further show by simulation that even moderately-incomplete sampling of species occurrences through time may induce rate scaling. We thus conclude that there are no significant scaling relationships present in these fossil clades, and that any apparent trend is caused by sampling artefacts and taxonomic practices. If rate scaling in molecular phylogenies is genuine, the absence of such a relationship in the fossil record will provide a valuable benchmark and constraint on what processes can cause it. HighlightsO_LIStudies have found that fossil and molecular diversification rates scale with time C_LIO_LISuch rate scaling hints at a disconnect between micro- and macroevolution C_LIO_LIThese trends are absent from the fossil record when controlling for sampling biases C_LIO_LIRate scaling in general may be artefactual, or fossils could show distinct patterns C_LI