bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
A scoping review on the use of consumer-grade EEG devices for research
Joshua SabioiD, Nikolas WilliamsiD, Genevieve M. McArthuriD, Nicholas A. BadcockiD
Abstract
BACKGROUNDCommercial electroencephalography (EEG) devices have become increasingly available over the last decade. These devices have been used in a wide variety of fields ranging from engineering to cognitive neuroscience. PURPOSEThe aim of this study was to chart peer-review articles that used currently available consumer-grade EEG devices to collect neural data. We provide an overview of the research conducted with these relatively more affordable and user-friendly devices. We also inform future research by exploring the current and potential scope of consumer-grade EEG. METHODSWe followed a five-stage methodological framework for a scoping review that included a systematic search using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. We searched the following electronic databases: PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore. We charted study data according to application (BCI, experimental research, validation, signal processing, and clinical) and location of use as indexed by the first authors country. RESULTSWe identified 916 studies that used data recorded with consumer-grade EEG: 531 were reported in journal articles and 385 in conference papers. Emotiv devices were most used, followed by the NeuroSky MindWave, OpenBCI, interaXon Muse, and MyndPlay Mindband. The most common use was for brain-computer interfaces, followed by experimental research, signal processing, validation, and clinical purposes. CONCLUSIONSConsumer-grade EEG has proven to be a useful tool for neuroscientific research and will likely continue to be used well into the future. Our study provides a comprehensive review of their application, as well as future directions for researchers who wish to use these devices.
- Citations
- 5
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- 10 Years of EPOC: A scoping review of Emotiv's portable EEG device
Nikolas Williams, Genevieve M. McArthur, Nicholas A. Badcock·bioRxiv·Jul 14, 2020
- Mobile EEG for Neurourbanism Research - What Could Possibly Go Wrong?A Critical Review with Guidelines
Klaus Gramann·Journal of Environmental PsychologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 24, 2024
- Resting-state EEG recorded with gel-based versus consumer dry electrodes: spectral characteristics and across-device correlations
Daria F. Kleeva, Ivan Ninenko, Mikhail Lebedev·bioRxiv·Aug 9, 2023
- Crowdsourced EEG Experiments: A proof of concept for remote EEG acquisition using EmotivPRO Builder and EmotivLABS
Nikolas Williams, William L. King, … Nicholas A. Badcock·HeliyonPeer-reviewed·Jul 24, 2023
- A Large Electroencephalogram Database of Freewill Reaching and Grasping Tasks for Brain Machine Interfaces
Bhoj Raj Thapa, John Boggess, Jihye Bae·Scientific DataPeer-reviewed·Nov 7, 2025
- Recording brain activity with ear-EEG (cEEGrids)
Daniel Hölle, Martin Georg Bleichner·Journal of Visualized ExperimentsPeer-reviewed·Mar 31, 2023