bioRxivDevelopmental BiologyPreprint
Regional Differences in Dorsal Skin Determine the Rate of Adhesive Material-Induced Hair Regeneration
Tomoyuki Toge, Moyuri Inoue, Ying Ying Chou, Anna YoshimuraiD, Sachiko Yamashita Takeuchi, Kayoko Nakao Kuroishi, Kaori K Gungikake, Jun J. MiyamotoiD, Takuma MatsubaraiD, Osamu KaminumaiD, Tatsuo Kawamoto, Shoichiro KokabuiD
Abstract
Dorsal skin is widely used in mouse wound-healing, dermatitis, and hair-cycle models, but is often treated as a uniform site. We investigated whether adhesive material (cyanoacrylate)-induced hair regeneration, a model we previously reported, differs by position within the dorsal skin. Adhesive material was applied to four regions along the cranial-to-caudal axis of the mouse dorsal skin. Hair regrowth appeared earlier at the cranial sites than at the caudal sites, and this difference persisted through late anagen and the anagen-to-catagen transition. In contrast, hair regrowth after full-thickness skin excision was slower, smaller in area, and less reproducible than that after adhesive material application. Expression of Hox genes, including Hoxa9, Hoxb9, Hoxc9, Hoxa10, and Hoxc10, was higher at the caudal sites than at the cranial sites but did not correlate with the timing of hair regrowth. RNA sequencing of intact skin from the cranial and caudal sites revealed distinct baseline profiles, including differences in the Wnt inhibitor Sfrp4 and the adipogenic genes Ppar{gamma} and Fabp4. Early after adhesive material application, histological changes and the expression of inflammation- and tissue-repair-related genes also differed between the cranial and caudal skin. These findings indicate that mouse dorsal skin is not a uniform experimental field and that cranial-to-caudal position should be considered when designing and interpreting hair-regeneration and wound-healing experiments in mice.
- organism: mouse
- assay: bulk RNA-seq
- research focus: differential expression
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Sex Differences in Physiological Hair Cycling and Adhesive Material-Induced Hair Regeneration in Mice
Ying Ying Chou, Moyuri Inoue, … Shoichiro Kokabu·bioRxiv·Jul 24, 2026
- Wound-initiated hair regeneration by adhesive and shrinkable materials
Shoichiro Kokabu, Kunikazu Tsuji, … Takuma Matsubara·bioRxiv·Aug 27, 2024
- De Novo Regeneration of Rete Ridges during Cetacean skin wound healing
Tzu‐Yu Liu, Hao‐Ven Wang, … Michael Warren Hughes·JID InnovationsPeer-reviewed·Sep 21, 2026
- Allele-specific expression reveals genetic drivers of tissue regeneration in mice
Heather Elizabeth desJardins-Park, Katya L. Mack, … Michael Thornton Longaker·bioRxiv·Sep 23, 2022
- In vivo reprogramming of wound-resident cells generates skin with hair
Y. Moriwaki, Q. Shen, … M. Kurita·bioRxiv·Mar 5, 2023
- A novel fracture lattice in spiny mouse skin facilitates tissue autotomy and regeneration
Daeryeok Ko, Yeong Chan Ryu, … Hanseul Yang·bioRxiv·Mar 24, 2026