Nature Machine IntelligenceBioengineeringPeer-reviewed journal article
Non-invasive brain-machine interface control with artificial intelligence copilots
Johannes Y. LeeiD, SangJoon LeeiD, Abhishek MishraiD, Yan XuiD, Brandon McMahaniD, Brent Gaisford, Charles Kobashigawa, Mike Qu, Chang XieiD, Jonathan C. KaoiD
Abstract
Motor brain-machine interfaces (BMIs) decode neural signals to help people with paralysis move and communicate. Even with important advances in the last two decades, BMIs face key obstacles to clinical viability. Invasive BMIs achieve proficient cursor and robotic arm control but require neurosurgery, posing significant risk to patients. Non-invasive BMIs do not have neurosurgical risk, but achieve lower performance, sometimes being prohibitively frustrating to use and preventing widespread adoption. We take a step toward breaking this performance-risk tradeoff by building performant non-invasive BMIs. The critical limitation that bounds decoder performance in non-invasive BMIs is their poor neural signal-to-noise ratio. To overcome this, we contribute (1) a novel EEG decoding approach and (2) artificial intelligence (AI) copilots that infer task goals and aid action completion. We demonstrate that with this "AI-BMI," in tandem with a new adaptive decoding approach using a convolutional neural network (CNN) and ReFIT-like Kalman filter (KF), healthy users and a paralyzed participant can autonomously and proficiently control computer cursors and robotic arms. Using an AI copilot improves goal acquisition speed by up to 4.3x in the standard center-out 8 cursor control task and enables users to control a robotic arm to perform the sequential pick-and-place task, moving 4 randomly placed blocks to 4 randomly chosen locations. As AI copilots improve, this approach may result in clinically viable non-invasive AI-BMIs.
- organism: human
- assay: electrophysiology
- research focus: drug response / drug discovery
- approach: deep learning
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 29
- FWCI
- 13.96
- Field percentile
- top 1%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A non-invasive brain-machine interface via independent control of individual motor units
E. Formento, P. Botros, J. Carmena·bioRxiv·Mar 22, 2021
- Preserved Neural Dynamics across Arm- and Brain-controlled Movements
Chenyang Li, Xinxiu Xu, … He Cui·bioRxiv·Nov 27, 2025
- Artificial neural network for brain-machine interface consistently produces more naturalistic finger movements than linear methods
Hisham Temmar, Matthew S. Willsey, … Cynthia A. Chestek·bioRxiv·Mar 1, 2024
- Exploring the trade-off between deep-learning and explainable models for brain-machine interfaces
Luis Hernan Cubillos, Guy Revach, … Cynthia A. Chestek·neural information processing systemsPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2024
- Neuroscience-Inspired Deep Learning Brain-Machine Interface Decoder
Hongyun Ou, Takahiro Hasegawa, … Eizo Miyashita·BioengineeringPeer-reviewed·Apr 10, 2026
- Cortical control of virtual self-motion using task-specific subspaces
Karen E. Schroeder, Sean M. Perkins, … Mark M. Churchland·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Oct 29, 2021