henhaobio
Sign in

Nature Machine IntelligenceBioengineeringPeer-reviewed journal article

Non-invasive brain-machine interface control with artificial intelligence copilots

Johannes Y. LeeiD, SangJoon LeeiD, Abhishek MishraiD, Yan XuiD, Brandon McMahaniD, Brent Gaisford, Charles Kobashigawa, Mike Qu, Chang XieiD, Jonathan C. KaoiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

Motor brain-machine interfaces (BMIs) decode neural signals to help people with paralysis move and communicate. Even with important advances in the last two decades, BMIs face key obstacles to clinical viability. Invasive BMIs achieve proficient cursor and robotic arm control but require neurosurgery, posing significant risk to patients. Non-invasive BMIs do not have neurosurgical risk, but achieve lower performance, sometimes being prohibitively frustrating to use and preventing widespread adoption. We take a step toward breaking this performance-risk tradeoff by building performant non-invasive BMIs. The critical limitation that bounds decoder performance in non-invasive BMIs is their poor neural signal-to-noise ratio. To overcome this, we contribute (1) a novel EEG decoding approach and (2) artificial intelligence (AI) copilots that infer task goals and aid action completion. We demonstrate that with this "AI-BMI," in tandem with a new adaptive decoding approach using a convolutional neural network (CNN) and ReFIT-like Kalman filter (KF), healthy users and a paralyzed participant can autonomously and proficiently control computer cursors and robotic arms. Using an AI copilot improves goal acquisition speed by up to 4.3x in the standard center-out 8 cursor control task and enables users to control a robotic arm to perform the sequential pick-and-place task, moving 4 randomly placed blocks to 4 randomly chosen locations. As AI copilots improve, this approach may result in clinically viable non-invasive AI-BMIs.

Citations
29
FWCI
13.96
Field percentile
top 1%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISFormento '21Li '25Temmar '24Cubillos '24Ou '26Schroeder '21
77% semantic matchBioengineering
E. Formento, P. Botros, J. Carmena·bioRxiv·Mar 22, 2021