Reliability of Static and Dynamic Network Metrics in the Resting-State: A MEG-beamformed Connectivity Analysis
Stavros I. DimitriadisiD, Bethany C. RoutleyiD, David E.J. LindeniD, Krish D. SinghiD
Abstract
The resting activity of the brain can be described by so-called intrinsic connectivity networks (ICNs), which consist of spatially and temporally distributed, but functionally connected, nodes. The coordinated activity of the resting state can be explored via magnetoencephalography (MEG) by studying frequency-dependent functional brain networks at the source level. Although many algorithms for the analysis of brain connectivity have been proposed, the reliability of network metrics derived from both static and dynamic functional connectivity is still unknown. This is a particular problem for studies of associations between ICN metrics and personality variables or other traits, and for studies of differences between patient and control groups, which both depend critically on the reliability of the metrics used. A detailed investigation of the reliability of metrics derived from resting-state MEG repeat scans is therefore a prerequisite for the development of connectomic biomarkers.\n\nHere, we first estimated both static (SFC) and dynamic functional connectivity (DFC) after beamforming source reconstruction using the imaginary part of the phase locking index (iPLV) and the correlation of the amplitude envelope (CorEnv). Using our approach, functional network microstates (FCstates) were derived from the DFC and chronnectomics were computed from the evolution of FCstates across experimental time. In both temporal scales, the reliability of network metrics (SFC), the FCstates and the related chronnectomics were evaluated for every frequency band.\n\nChronnectomic parameters and FCstates were generally more reliable than node-wise static network metrics. CorEnv-based network metrics were more reproducible at the static approach. This analysis encourages the analysis of MEG resting-state via DFC.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 41
- FWCI
- 3.72
- Field percentile
- top 6%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Test-retest reliability of resting-state fMRI functional connectivity: impact of scan length and number of participants
Beatriz Vale, Marta Correia, Patricia Figueiredo·bioRxiv·Jun 8, 2026
- Measuring robust functional connectivity from resting-state MEG using amplitude and entropy correlation across frequency-bands and temporal scales
Megan Godfrey, Krish D. Singh·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Nov 10, 2020
- Dynamic Functional Network Connectivity In Schizophrenia With MEG And fMRI, Do Different Time Scales Tell A Different Story?
Lori Sanfratello, Jon M. Houck, Vince D. Calhoun·Brain ConnectivityPeer-reviewed·Jan 11, 2019
- Metastability, fractal scaling, and synergistic information processing: what phase relationships reveal about intrinsic brain activity
Fran Hancock, Joana Cabral, … Federico Turkheimer·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2022
- Test-Retest Reliability of Dynamic Functional Connectivity Parameters for a Two-State Model
Xiaojing Fang, Michael Marxen·Network NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2025
- Relationship between MEG global dynamic functional network connectivity measures and symptoms in schizophrenia
Lori Sanfratello, Jon M. Houck, Vince D. Calhoun·Schizophrenia ResearchPeer-reviewed·May 24, 2019