Cognitive Affective & Behavioral NeuroscienceNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
When attention falters: brain, breathing, and behavioral signals of lapses in interoceptive attention
Isaac N. TrevesiD, Clare ShafferiD, Alexandra L. DeckeriD, Nigel JaffeiD, Anna O. TierneyiD, Randy Patrick AuerbachiD, Christian A. WebbiD
Abstract
Mindlbody practices like meditation and yoga involve paying attention to breathing sensations. During these practices, individuals report "interoceptive lapses," moments when attention drifts away from internal bodily sensations. While lapses in attention to the external world have been widely studied, little is known about the physiological and neural mechanisms of interoceptive lapses. Interoceptive lapses may share markers with exteroceptive lapses--such as reaction time variability and default-mode network (DMN) connectivity--but may also depend on distinct brain systems and breathing physiology. Here we examined behavioral, physiological and neural signals preceding lapses in a sample of 93 adolescents enriched for GAD and depression symptoms. Participants performed a 20-minute breath counting task in the fMRI scanner with simultaneous breath recordings. Lapses were defined as moments when counting errors occurred. The sample was split into training and validation sets to test machine learning models predicting attentional lapses. The strongest predictors were timing and variability of button responses (AUCs > 0.75). Breathing variability and breathing-behavior synchronization showed smaller but generalizable predictive value (AUCs < 0.65). Whole-brain connectivity models also predicted lapses (AUC {approx} 0.65), incorporating the DMN, dorsal and ventral attention, and somatomotor networks. Further, models that included brain connectivity marginally outperformed behavior-only models. Comparisons to previous exteroceptive findings indicate some common markers (e.g., reaction time variability) and some unique markers (e.g., selective perceptual coupling with attentional networks). Although limited by the clinical sample and lack of a control task, these results highlight brain-body markers of interoceptive attention that may inform real-time monitoring during mind-body interventions.
- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- 45th percentile
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The Filter Detection Task for measurement of breathing-related interoception and metacognition
Olivia K. Harrison, Sarah N. Garfinkel, … Stephen M. Fleming·Biological PsychologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 3, 2021
- Interoception of breathing and its relationship with anxiety
Olivia K. Harrison, Laura Köchli, … Klaas Enno Stephan·NeuronPeer-reviewed·Oct 21, 2021
- Interoceptive Awareness of the Breath Preserves Dorsal Attention Network Activity amidst Widespread Cortical Deactivation: A Within-Participant Neuroimaging Study
Norman A. S. Farb, Zoey Zuo, Cynthia J Price·bioRxiv·May 27, 2022
- Assessing the effects of an 8-week mindfulness training program on neural oscillations and self-reports during meditation practice
Julio Rodriguez‐Larios, Kian Foong Wong, Julian Lim·bioRxiv·Feb 9, 2024
- Confounding effects of heart rate, breathing rate, and frontal fNIRS on interoception
Diego Candia‐Rivera, María Sofía Sappia, … Gaetano Valenza·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Nov 30, 2022
- Perceived Control Over Breathing Perturbations Depends on Interosensory Input and Prediction Error
Alexander J. Hess, Giulia Cornali, … Klaas Enno Stephan·bioRxiv·Aug 4, 2026