Sign in
NeuroscienceJournal of Vision
Peer-reviewed journal article

Visual discrimination of optical material properties: a large-scale study

Masataka SawayamaiD, Yoshinori DobashiiD, Makoto OkabeiD, Kenchi HosokawaiD, Takuya KoumuraiD, Toni SaarelaiD, Maria OlkkoneniD, Shin’ya NishidaiD

Abstract

Complex visual processing involved in perceiving the object materials can be better elucidated by taking a variety of research approaches. Sharing stimulus and response data is an effective strategy to make the results of different studies directly comparable and can assist researchers with different backgrounds to jump into the field. Here, we constructed a database containing several sets of material images annotated with visual discrimination performance. We created the material images using physically-based computer graphics techniques and conducted psychophysical experiments with them in both laboratory and crowdsourcing settings. The observers task was to discriminate materials on one of six dimensions (gloss contrast, gloss distinctness-of-image, translucent vs. opaque, metal vs. plastic, metal vs. glass, and glossy vs. painted). The illumination consistency and object geometry were also varied. We used a non-verbal procedure (an oddity task) applicable for diverse use-cases such as cross-cultural, cross-species, clinical, or developmental studies. Results showed that the material discrimination depended on the illuminations and geometries and that the ability to discriminate the spatial consistency of specular highlights in glossiness perception showed larger individual differences than in other tasks. In addition, analysis of visual features showed that the parameters of higher-order color texture statistics can partially, but not completely, explain task performance. The results obtained through crowdsourcing were highly correlated with those obtained in the laboratory, suggesting that our database can be used even when the experimental conditions are not strictly controlled in the laboratory. Several projects using our dataset are underway.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
28
FWCI
1.80
Field percentile
top 16%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISSchmid '23Liao '22Xiao '20Morimoto '23Glukhova '26Nomachi '25
73% semantic matchNeuroscience
Alexandra C. Schmid, Pascal Barla, Katja Doerschner·Nature Human Behaviour·Jun 29, 2023· 33 citations