Global Genotype by Environment Prediction Competition Reveals That Diverse Modeling Strategies Can Deliver Satisfactory Maize Yield Estimates
Jacob D. WashburniD, José Ignacio VarelaiD, Alencar XavieriD, Qiuyue CheniD, David ErtliD, Joseph L. GageiD, James Brendan HollandiD, Dayane Cristina LimaiD, M. Cinta RomayiD, Marco Antonio Lopez-CruziD, Gustavo de los CamposiD, Wesley Barber, Cristiano Mathias ZimmeriD, Ignacio Trucillo SilvaiD, Fabiani da Rocha, Renaud RincentiD, Baber Ali, Haixiao HuiD, Daniel E. RuncieiD, Kirill Gusev, Andrei SlabodkiniD, Phillip Bax, Julie AubertiD, Hugo GangloffiD, Tristan Mary‐HuardiD, , Natalia de LeóniD
Abstract
Predicting phenotypes from a combination of genetic and environmental factors is a grand challenge of modern biology. Slight improvements in this area have the potential to save lives, improve food and fuel security, permit better care of the planet, and create other positive outcomes. In 2022 and 2023 the first open-to-the-public Genomes to Fields (G2F) initiative Genotype by Environment (GxE) prediction competition was held using a large dataset including genomic variation, phenotype and weather measurements and field management notes, gathered by the project over nine years. The competition attracted registrants from around the world with representation from academic, government, industry, and non-profit institutions as well as unaffiliated. These participants came from diverse disciplines include plant science, animal science, breeding, statistics, computational biology and others. Some participants had no formal genetics or plant-related training, and some were just beginning their graduate education. The teams applied varied methods and strategies, providing a wealth of modeling knowledge based on a common dataset. The winners strategy involved two models combining machine learning and traditional breeding tools: one model emphasized environment using features extracted by Random Forest, Ridge Regression and Least-squares, and one focused on genetics. Other high-performing teams methods included quantitative genetics, classical machine learning/deep learning, mechanistic models, and model ensembles. The dataset factors used, such as genetics; weather; and management data, were also diverse, demonstrating that no single model or strategy is far superior to all others within the context of this competition.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 30
- FWCI
- 7.29
- Field percentile
- top 2%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Using machine learning to integrate genetic and environmental data to model genotype-by-environment interactions
Igor Kuivjogi Fernandes, Caio Canella Vieira, … Samuel B. Fernandes·bioRxiv·Feb 8, 2024
- Modelling GxE with historical weather information improves genomic prediction in new environments
Jussi Gillberg, Pekka Marttinen, … Samuel Kaski A·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Apr 8, 2019
- GE-BiCross: A Hierarchical Bidirectional Cross-Attention Framework for Genotype-by-Environment Prediction in Maize
Shuchang Zhou, Weipeng Fang, … Ting Zhao·bioRxiv·Mar 12, 2026
- Reaction Norm Modeling of High-Dimensional Genomic and Environmental Data Improves Prediction Accuracy in Winter Wheat
Shailesh Raj Acharya, Julián García‐Abadillo, … Nonoy B. Bandillo·The Plant GenomePeer-reviewed·Oct 27, 2026
- Ensemble of BLUP, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning Models Predict Maize Yield Better Than Each Model Alone.
D. R. Kick, J. D. Washburn·bioRxiv·Mar 30, 2023
- A new evolution-based genomic prediction model forecasts yield performance across environments and future climates and identifies adapted maize landraces
Agustin Galaretto, Marie Pégard, … Stéphane Nicolas·bioRxiv·Apr 30, 2026