bioRxivMicrobiologyPreprint
A droplet-to-data workflow for antimicrobial screening of complex matrices
Immanuel SankaiD, Merike VaheriD, R. Aditya Aryandi SetiawibawaiD, Piret Saar‐ReismaaiD, Pille PataiD, Katri Ruuson, Ott ScheleriD, Simona BartkovaiD
Abstract
Screening plant extracts and other complex natural matrices for antibacterial activity is complicated by optical interference and population averaging in conventional bulk assays. Droplet-based assays mitigate interference while enabling high-throughput assessment of bacterial subpopulations. However, analyzing the resulting image data involves difficult image processing, classification, and interpretation. Here, we present a democratized workflow for antimicrobial screening in complex matrices that combines a polydisperse droplet-based assay with EasyFlow 2.0 (EF2), our updated droplet image analysis platform. EF2 offers stable containerized deployment, expanded polydisperse droplet support, automated thresholding and MIC estimation, LLM-assisted data exploration, and import of other software outputs such as CellProfiler (CP) measurements and CellProfiler Analyst (CPA) classification models. As proof of concept, we applied this workflow to assess the antibacterial and aggregation-modulating effects of chemically distinct extracts of Taraxacum officinale, Rhodiola rosea, and Lonicera caerulea against Escherichia coli. Extracts were chemically characterized by HPLC-MS and evaluated using both standard 96-well plate microdilution and droplet-based assays. In total, 27,059 droplets were segmented in CP, classified into four growth phenotypes using a CPA random forest model, and analyzed in EF2. The droplet-based assay reached minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) at lower extract concentrations than 96-well plate microdilution and revealed extract-specific aggregation effects: L. caerulea reduced E. coli aggregation, whereas T. officinale did not. R. rosea reduced growth in the 96-well plate microdilution assay, but high concentrations caused droplet gelation that prevented droplet-based analysis, showing that sample components must be checked for compatibility with droplet formation. These results illustrate that the EF2-centered workflow supports rapid, automated MIC estimation through unsupervised thresholding when labels are unavailable, and four-class aggregation phenotyping when a CPA model is supplied. This workflow offers flexible, scalable screening, potentially extendable beyond plant extracts to other complex sample matrices.
- organism: E. coli
- assay: imaging
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: cell-cell communication
- approach: statistical model
- approach: machine learning (classical)
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- High-throughput bacterial aggregation analysis in droplets
Merili Saar-Abroi, Karoliine Lindpere, … Ott Scheler·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Dec 2, 2025
- Highly parallelized microfluidic droplet cultivation and prioritization on antibiotic producers from complex natural microbial communities
- CellProfiler: A fit tool for image analysis in droplet microfluidics
Simona Bartkova, Marko Vendelin, … Ott Scheler·Analytical MethodsPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2020
- User-friendly analysis of droplet array images
Immanuel Sanka, Simona Bartkova, … Ott Scheler·Analytica Chimica ActaPeer-reviewed·Jun 4, 2023
- Label-free droplet image analysis with Cellprofiler
Daniel Kacsor, Merili Saar-Abroi, … Ott Scheler·bioRxiv·Apr 4, 2025
- Microscale assay to evaluate the minimum inhibitory concentration of purified compounds with limited sample volume
Shashank Kashyap, Sumit Biswas·bioRxiv·Jul 8, 2026