Sign in
NeuroscienceComputational Psychiatry
Peer-reviewed journal article

A competition of critics in human decision-making

Enkhzaya EnkhtaivaniD, Joel NishimuraiD, Cheng LyiD, Amy Louise CochraniD

Abstract

Recent experiments and theories of human decision-making suggest positive and negative errors are processed and encoded differently by serotonin and dopamine, with serotonin possibly serving to oppose dopamine and protect against risky decisions. We introduce a temporal difference (TD) model of human decision-making to account for these features. Our model involves two critics, an optimistic learning system and a pessimistic learning system, whose predictions are integrated in time to control how potential decisions compete to be selected. Our model predicts that human decision-making can be decomposed along two dimensions: the degree to which the individual is sensitive to (1) risk and (2) uncertainty. In addition, we demonstrate that the model can learn about reward expectations and uncertainty, and provide information about reaction time despite not modeling these variables directly. Lastly, we simulate a recent experiment to show how updates of the two learning systems could relate to dopamine and serotonin transients, thereby providing a mathematical formalism to serotonins hypothesized role as an opponent to dopamine. This new model should be useful for future experiments on human decision-making.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
6
FWCI
0.53
Field percentile
top 43%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.