bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Object speed and distractor number do not affect attentional allocation in multiple object tracking
- Citations
- 0
Abstract
Keeping track of multiple moving objects across dynamic real-world scenarios such as driving, team sports, or crowded social environments is a fundamental challenge for visual attention. We have previously demonstrated that as the number of tracked objects increases, the strength of attentional facilitation allocated to each individual object decreases, limiting tracking success. It is also well established that beyond the number of tracked objects, faster-moving objects and objects embedded amongst higher numbers of distractors are more difficult to track. Are these effects on tracking difficulty also mediated by less effective allocation of attention to tracked targets as in the case of tracking more targets? If so, one should expect the strength of attentional modulation to drop systematically with increasing speed and total number of moving stimuli. In two experiments (total n = 70), participants were instructed to track moving targets amongst identical distractors while we manipulated object speed (Experiment 1) and number (Experiment 2). As expected, tracking performance declined with both manipulations. However, steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs) recorded during successful tracking revealed that attentional enhancement of tracked targets compared with distractors did not drop with increasing speed or object number. In summary, bottom-up changes in the stimulus display and top-down attentional manipulations affect tracking performance in independent ways, with the balance between strength of attentional allocation and bottom-up demands of the task determining successful tracking. The allocation of attention itself seems to be determined exclusively by top-down goals rather than being reactive to bottom-up display characteristics. Open Practices StatementParticipant level data and analysis code for all experiments are available at (https://osf.io/ypgfs/) and Experiment 1 was preregistered (https://osf.io/pxh25/). Significance statementKeeping track of multiple moving objects is fundamental to navigating dynamic real-world scenarios. This ability is accomplished through multifocal attentional selection, which weakens as the number of tracked targets increases. This study asks whether other stimulus manipulations increase tracking difficulty by diluting attentional allocation. Using steady-state visual evoked potentials to measure selective attention during tracking, we demonstrate that both increases in speed and distractor number impair performance, however, they do not affect attentional enhancement of targets. This suggests that top-down attentional control operates independently from bottom-up demands.
- assay: imaging
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: clustering
- approach: statistical model
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Attentional enhancement of tracked stimuli in early visual cortex has limited capacity
N. Adamian, S. K. Andersen·bioRxiv·Sep 8, 2022
- Distinct neural mechanisms meet challenges in dynamic visual attention due to either load or spatial interference
Verónica Mäki-Marttunen, Thomas Hagen, … Thomas Espeseth·Journal of Cognitive NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Sep 27, 2019
- Theory of Visual Attention (TVA) in Action: Assessing Premotor Attention in Simultaneous Eye-Hand Movements
Philipp Kreyenmeier, Heiner Deubel, Nina M. Hanning·CortexPeer-reviewed·Oct 8, 2020
- In pursuit of visual attention: SSVEP frequency-tagging moving targets
Peter de Lissa, Roberto Caldara, … Sébastien Miellet·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Aug 4, 2020
- Environmental Volatility Shifts Visual Search from Capture to Caution
Nan Qiu, Fredrik Allenmark, … Zhuanghua Shi·bioRxiv·May 12, 2026
- Humans reconfigure target and distractor processing to address distinct task demands
Harrison Ritz, Amitai Shenhav·Psychological ReviewPeer-reviewed·Sep 5, 2023