bioRxivAnimal Behavior & Cognition
Attentional enhancement of tracked stimuli in early visual cortex has limited capacity
Abstract
Keeping track of the location of multiple simultaneously moving objects is one of the well documented functions of visual spatial attention. However, the mechanism of attentional selection that supports continuous tracking of several items is unclear. In particular, it has been proposed that target selection in early visual cortex occurs in parallel, with tracking errors arising due to attentional limitations at later processing stages. Here we examine whether, instead, total attentional capacity for enhancement of early visual processing of tracked targets is shared between all attended stimuli. If the magnitude of attentional facilitation of multiple tracked targets was a key limiting factor of tracking ability, then one should expect it to drop systematically with increasing set-size of tracked targets. Human observers (male and female) were instructed to track two, four, or six moving objects among a pool of identical distractors. Steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs) recorded during the tracking period revealed that the processing of tracked targets was consistently amplified compared to the processing of the distractors. The magnitude of this amplification decreased with increasing set size, and at lateral occipital electrodes it closely followed inverse proportionality to the number of tracked items, suggesting that limited attentional resources must be shared among the tracked stimuli. Accordingly, the magnitude of attentional facilitation predicted the behavioural outcome at the end of the trial. Together, these findings demonstrate that the limitations of multiple object tracking across set-sizes stem from the limitations of top-down selective attention already at the early stages of visual processing. Significance statementThe ability to selectively attend to relevant features or objects is the key to flexibility of perception and action in the continuously changing environment. This ability is demonstrated in the Multiple Object Tracking task where observers monitor multiple independently moving objects at different locations in the visual field. The role of early attentional enhancement in tracking was previously acknowledged in the literature, however, the limitations on tracking were thought to arise during later stages of processing. Here, we demonstrate that the strength of attentional facilitation depends on the number of tracked objects and predicts successful tracking performance. Thus, it is the limitations of attentional enhancement at the early stages of visual processing that determine behavioral performance limits.
- organism: human
- assay: electrophysiology
- research focus: synaptic & neural circuits
- approach: experimental assay
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Object speed and distractor number do not affect attentional allocation in multiple object tracking
Nika Adamian, Feride Akalan, Andersen Sk·bioRxiv·Dec 28, 2025
- Humans can efficiently look for but not select multiple visual objects
Eduard Ort, Johannes J. Fahrenfort, … Christian N. L. Olivers·eLifePeer-reviewed·Aug 27, 2019
- Training qualitatively shifts the neural mechanisms that support attentional selection
Sirawaj Itthipuripat, Kexin Cha, … John T. Serences·PLoS BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jun 27, 2017
- Spatial attention enhances cortical tracking of quasi-rhythmic visual stimuli
Davide Tabarelli, Christian Keitel, … Daniel Baldauf·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Dec 6, 2019
- When spatial attention cannot be divided: Quadrantic enhancement of early visual processing across task-relevant and irrelevant locations
Mert Özkan, Viola S. Störmer·Imaging NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2024
- Distinct neural mechanisms meet challenges in dynamic visual attention due to either load or spatial interference
Verónica Mäki-Marttunen, Thomas Hagen, … Thomas Espeseth·Journal of Cognitive NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Sep 27, 2019