Differential effects of endogenous and exogenous attention on sensory tuning
Abstract
Covert spatial attention (without concurrent eye movements) improves performance in many visual tasks (e.g., orientation discrimination and visual search). However, both covert attention systems, endogenous (voluntary) and exogenous (involuntary), exhibit differential effects on performance in tasks mediated by spatial and temporal resolution suggesting an underlying mechanistic difference. We investigated whether these differences manifest in sensory tuning by assessing whether and how endogenous and exogenous attention differentially alter the representation of two basic visual dimensions: orientation and spatial frequency (SF). The same human observers detected a vertical grating embedded in noise in two separate experiments (with cues to elicit either endogenous or exogenous attention) and reverse correlation was used to infer the underlying neural representation from behavioral responses. Both endogenous and exogenous attention similarly improved performance at the attended location by enhancing the gain of all orientations without changing tuning width. In the SF dimension, endogenous attention enhanced the gain of SFs above and below the target SF, whereas exogenous attention only enhanced those above. Additionally, exogenous attention shifted peak sensitivity to SFs above the target SF, whereas endogenous attention did not. Both covert attention systems modulated sensory tuning via the same computation (gain changes). However, there were differences in the strength of the gain. Compared to endogenous attention, exogenous attention had a stronger orientation gain enhancement but a weaker overall SF gain enhancement. These differences in sensory tuning may underlie differential effects of endogenous and exogenous attention on performance.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 51
- FWCI
- 3.68
- Field percentile
- top 6%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Exogenous attention facilitates performance through dissociable sensitivity and bias mechanisms
Vishak Sagar, Ranit Sengupta, Devarajan Sridharan·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Sep 2, 2019
- An image-computable model on how endogenous and exogenous attention differentially alter visual perception
Michael Jigo, David J. Heeger, Marisa Carrasco·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Aug 13, 2021
- Differential and overlapping effects between exogenous and endogenous attention shape perceptual facilitation during visual processing
Mathieu Landry, Jason da Silva Castanheira, Karim Jerbi·Journal of Cognitive NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2023
- Frequency-dependent modulation of foveal contrast sensitivity by fine-scale exogenously triggered attention
Yue Guzhang, T. Florian Jaeger, Martina Poletti·bioRxiv·Aug 27, 2025
- Covert spatial attention is uniform across cardinal meridians despite differential adaptation
Hsing-Hao Lee, Marisa Carrasco·Journal of VisionPeer-reviewed·Jan 28, 2026
- Sensory and decisional components of endogenous attention are dissociable.
Sanjna Banerjee, Shrey Grover, … Devarajan Sridharan·Journal of NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 3, 2019