Sign in
NeuroscienceJournal of Neuroscience
Peer-reviewed journal article

Differential effects of endogenous and exogenous attention on sensory tuning

Antonio FernándeziD, Sara Okun, Marisa CarrascoiD

Abstract

Covert spatial attention (without concurrent eye movements) improves performance in many visual tasks (e.g., orientation discrimination and visual search). However, both covert attention systems, endogenous (voluntary) and exogenous (involuntary), exhibit differential effects on performance in tasks mediated by spatial and temporal resolution suggesting an underlying mechanistic difference. We investigated whether these differences manifest in sensory tuning by assessing whether and how endogenous and exogenous attention differentially alter the representation of two basic visual dimensions: orientation and spatial frequency (SF). The same human observers detected a vertical grating embedded in noise in two separate experiments (with cues to elicit either endogenous or exogenous attention) and reverse correlation was used to infer the underlying neural representation from behavioral responses. Both endogenous and exogenous attention similarly improved performance at the attended location by enhancing the gain of all orientations without changing tuning width. In the SF dimension, endogenous attention enhanced the gain of SFs above and below the target SF, whereas exogenous attention only enhanced those above. Additionally, exogenous attention shifted peak sensitivity to SFs above the target SF, whereas endogenous attention did not. Both covert attention systems modulated sensory tuning via the same computation (gain changes). However, there were differences in the strength of the gain. Compared to endogenous attention, exogenous attention had a stronger orientation gain enhancement but a weaker overall SF gain enhancement. These differences in sensory tuning may underlie differential effects of endogenous and exogenous attention on performance.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISSagar '19Jigo '21Landry '23Guzhang '25Lee '26Banerjee '19
82% semantic matchNeuroscience
Vishak Sagar, Ranit Sengupta, Devarajan Sridharan·Scientific Reports·Sep 2, 2019· 14 citations