Behavior Research MethodsNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Modeling pupil responses to rapid sequential events
Abstract
Pupil size is an easily accessible, noninvasive online indicator of various perceptual and cognitive processes. Pupil measurements have the potential to reveal continuous processing dynamics throughout an experimental trial, including anticipatory responses. However, the relatively sluggish ([~]2 s) response dynamics of pupil dilation make it challenging to connect changes in pupil size to events occurring close together in time. Researchers have used models to link changes in pupil size to specific trial events, but such methods have not been systematically evaluated. Here we developed and evaluated a general linear model (GLM) pipeline that estimates pupillary responses to multiple rapid events within an experimental trial. We evaluated the modeling approach using a sample dataset in which multiple sequential stimuli were presented within 2-s trials. We found: (1) Model fits improved when the pupil impulse response function (puRF) was fit for each observer. PuRFs varied substantially across individuals but were consistent for each individual. (2) Model fits also improved when pupil responses were not assumed to occur simultaneously with their associated trial events, but could have non-zero latencies. For example, pupil responses could anticipate predictable trial events. (3) Parameter recovery confirmed the validity of the fitting procedures, and we quantified the reliability of the parameter estimates for our sample dataset. (4) A cognitive task manipulation modulated pupil response amplitude. We provide our pupil analysis pipeline as open-source software (Pupil Response Estimation Toolbox: PRET) to facilitate the estimation of pupil responses and the evaluation of the estimates in other datasets.
- assay: imaging
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: trajectory inference
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 47
- FWCI
- 3.46
- Field percentile
- top 9%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A unified model of the task-evoked pupil response
Charlie S. Burlingham, Saghar Mirbagheri, David J. Heeger·Science AdvancesPeer-reviewed·Apr 20, 2022
- Model-based pupil deconvolution reveals latent attentional dynamics
Sangramjit Maity, Sebastiaan Mathôt, Sonia Baloni Ray·bioRxiv·Oct 8, 2026
- Methods in Cognitive Pupillometry: Design, Preprocessing, and Statistical Analysis
S. Mathot, A. Vilotijevic·bioRxiv·Feb 23, 2022
- Task-dependent pupillary responses to glossiness and attractiveness judgments
Hideki Tamura, Shigeki Nakauchi, Tetsuto Minami·Journal of VisionPeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2026
- Combining pupillometry and drift-diffusion models reveals auditory category learning dynamics
Jacie R. McHaney, Casey L. Roark, … Bharath Chandrasekaran·bioRxiv·Apr 16, 2024
- Pupil diameter tracked during motor adaptation in humans
Atsushi Yokoi, Jeffrey Weiler·Journal of NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Oct 5, 2022