NeuropsychologiaNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Distinct Neural Signatures of Multimodal Resizing Illusions: Implications for Chronic Pain Treatment
Kirralise J. HansfordiD, Daniel H. BakeriD, Kirsten J. McKenzieiD, Catherine PrestoniD
Abstract
Illusory body resizing typically uses multisensory integration to change the perceived size of a body part. Previous studies associate such multisensory body illusions with frontal theta oscillations and parietal gamma oscillations for dis-integration and integration of multisensory signals, respectively. However, recent studies support illusory changes of embodiment from visual-only stimuli. Multisensory resizing illusions can also reduce chronic pain, potentially through modulation of cortical body representations. This preregistered study (N=48) investigated differences between multisensory visuo-tactile and uni-modal visual resizing illusions using EEG. We hypothesised (1) stronger illusion in multisensory compared to uni-modal, and uni-modal compared to asynchronous (dis-integration) conditions, (2) greater parietal gamma during multisensory compared to uni-modal, and (3) greater frontal theta during asynchronous compared to baseline conditions. Results partially supported EEG hypotheses, finding increased parietal gamma activity comparing multisensory to unimodal visual conditions, whilst finding increased parietal theta activity when comparing asynchronous to non-illusion conditions. While results demonstrated that only 27% of participants experienced the illusion with visual-only stimuli, further analysis suggested that those who experience visual-only illusions exhibit a different neural signature to those who do not. Our results support the importance of multisensory integration for illusory changes in perceived body size. However, we also suggest that visual-only illusions can influence cortical body representations for a significant proportion of participants, which may have implications for the development of accessible visual-only chronic pain treatments.
- organism: human
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: cell type annotation
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 9
- FWCI
- 2.32
- Field percentile
- top 12%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Disruption by virtual reality of the cortical oscillations related to visuotactile integration during an embodiment process
Noriaki Kanayama, Masayuki Hara, Kenta Kimura·bioRxiv·Mar 27, 2020
- Perception - action dissociations depend on factors that affect multisensory processing
Nicola Bruno, Stefano Uccelli·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Nov 4, 2024
- Oscillatory signatures of crossmodal congruence effects: An EEG investigation employing a visuotactile pattern matching paradigm
Florian Göschl, Uwe Friese, … Andreas K. Engel·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Aug 1, 2015
- The contribution of stimulating multiple body parts simultaneously to the illusion of owning an entire artificial body
Sophie H. O’Kane, H. Henrik Ehrsson·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Jan 25, 2021
- A temporal parcellation of the sensory-evoked responses during the rubber hand illusion reveals manipulation- and illusion-specific correlates
Placido Sciortino, Christoph Kayser·bioRxiv·Jan 15, 2021
- The Emotional Glue of the Senses: Affective Certainty and Congruency in the Rubber Hand Illusion
Maria Laura Filippetti, Louise P. Kirsch, … Aikaterini Fotopoulou·bioRxiv·Aug 28, 2018