Neurons Behavior Data analysis and TheoryNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Overlapping neural representations for the position of visible and imagined objects
Amanda K. RobinsoniD, Tijl GrootswagersiD, Sophia M. ShatekiD, Jack Gerboni, Alex O. HolcombeiD, Thomas A. CarlsoniD
Abstract
Humans can covertly track the position of an object, even if the object is temporarily occluded. What are the neural mechanisms underlying our capacity to track moving objects when there is no physical stimulus for the brain to track? One possibility is that the brain "fills-in" information about imagined objects using internally generated representations similar to those generated by feed-forward perceptual mechanisms. Alternatively, the brain might deploy a higher order mechanism, for example using an object tracking model that integrates visual signals and motion dynamics (Kwon et al., 2015). In the present study, we used electroencephalography (EEG) and time-resolved multivariate pattern analyses to investigate the spatial processing of visible and imagined objects. Participants tracked an object that moved in discrete steps around fixation, occupying six consecutive locations. They were asked to imagine that the object continued on the same trajectory after it disappeared and move their attention to the corresponding positions. Time-resolved decoding of EEG data revealed that the location of the visible stimuli could be decoded shortly after image onset, consistent with early retinotopic visual processes. For processing of unseen/imagined positions, the patterns of neural activity resembled stimulus-driven mid-level visual processes, but were detected earlier than perceptual mechanisms, implicating an anticipatory and more variable tracking mechanism. Encoding models revealed that spatial representations were much weaker for imagined than visible stimuli. Monitoring the position of imagined objects thus utilises similar perceptual and attentional processes as monitoring objects that are actually present, but with different temporal dynamics. These results indicate that internally generated representations rely on top-down processes, and their timing is influenced by the predictability of the stimulus. All data and analysis code for this study are available at https://osf.io/8v47t/.
- Citations
- 22
- FWCI
- 2.11
- Field percentile
- top 14%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Position representations of moving objects align with real-time position in the early visual response
Philippa Anne Johnson, Tessel Blom, … Hinze Hogendoorn·eLifePeer-reviewed·Nov 17, 2022
- Cortical alpha rhythms predictively track occluded motion trajectories
Susan Ajith, Feyzanur Polat Kamis, … DANIEL H. KAISER·bioRxiv·Aug 25, 2026
- Image-grounded encoding models reveal distinct temporal profiles of naturalistic object and scene processing in the human brain
Niklas Müller, H. Steven Scholte, Iris I. A. Groen·bioRxiv·Jul 10, 2026
- Dynamic neural reconstructions of attended object location and features using EEG
Jiageng Chen, Julie D. Golomb·Journal of NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Jun 7, 2023
- The representation of stimulus features during stable fixation and active vision
Caoimhe Moran, Philippa Anne Johnson, … Ayelet Nina Landau·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 29, 2025
- Neural interference between real and imagined visual stimuli
Alexander A Sulfaro, Amanda K. Robinson, Thomas A. Carlson·bioRxiv·Jan 5, 2024