bioRxivEcologyPreprint
Conserving genetic diversity during climate change:Niche marginality and discrepant monitoring capacity in Europe
P. B. Pearman, O. Broennimann, T. Albayrak, P. C. Alves, L. D. Bertola, A. Biedrzycka, E. Buzan, V. Cubric-Curik, A. Fedorca, J. A. Godoy, C. Hvilsom, P. Klinga, M. K. Konopinski, A. Kopatz, L. Laikre, M. Lopez Fernandez, J. Mergeay, C. Neophytou, S. Palsson, I. Paz-Vinas, D. Posledovich, B. Roleckova, D. Rungis, G. Segelbacher, K. Kavcic Sonnenschein, , M. Bruford
Abstract
Genetic monitoring of populations currently attracts interest in the context of the Convention on Biological Diversity but needs long-term planning and investments. Genetic diversity has been largely neglected in biodiversity monitoring, and when addressed is treated separately, detached from other conservation issues, such as habitat alteration due to climate change. Genetic monitoring supports the conservation and management of fisheries, game, and threatened populations. It also can contribute to the assessment of predicted and realized impacts of climate change, and their management. We report the first accounting of genetic monitoring efforts among countries in Europe (their genetic monitoring capacity, GMC) to determine where GMC suggests the combination of national infrastructure, political support and resources for continued and expanded monitoring. Overlaying GMC with areas where species ranges approach current and future climate niche limits (i.e., niche marginality) helps identify whether GMC coincides with anticipated climate change effects on biodiversity. Our analysis suggests that country area extent, financial resources, and conservation policy influence GMC, high values of which inconsistently match joint species patterns of climate niche marginality. Populations at niche margins likely hold genetic diversity that is important to adaptation to changing climate, and our results illuminate the need in Europe for expanded genetic monitoring across the climate gradients occupied by species, a need arguably greatest in southeastern European countries.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Monitoring biodiversity in the global change era: The importance of herbaria and genetic diversity
Melissa Viveiros-Moniz, Ana García‐Muñoz, … A. Jesús Muñoz‐Pajares·Perspectives in Plant Ecology Evolution and SystematicsPeer-reviewed·Mar 11, 2025
- An analysis of genetic diversity actions, indicators and targets in 114 National Reports to the Convention on Biological Diversity
S. Hoban, C. Campbell, … M. E. Hunter·bioRxiv·Aug 28, 2020
- Gaps in the global protection of terrestrial genetic diversity
Jana Tabea Schultz, Jonas Geldmann, … David Nogués‐Bravo·bioRxiv·Aug 23, 2024
- The genetic consequences of population marginality: a case study in maritime pine
Adélaïde Theraroz, Carlos Guadaño‐Peyrot, … Santiago C. González‐Martínez·Diversity and DistributionsPeer-reviewed·Aug 5, 2024
- Challenges and opportunities for integrating genetic diversity monitoring in megadiverse countries: reflections from Mexico
Alicia Mastretta‐Yanes, Libertad Arredondo‐Amezcua, … Ana Wegier·bioRxiv·Oct 1, 2026
- Differing drivers of range-wide genetic diversity across previously glaciated Northern hemisphere landscapes
Lu Liu, James S. Borrell, Nian Wang·bioRxiv·Apr 28, 2025