An analysis of genetic diversity actions, indicators and targets in 114 National Reports to the Convention on Biological Diversity
S. Hoban, C. Campbell, J. da Silva, R. Ekblom, W. C. Funk, B. Garner, J. A. Godoy, F. Kershaw, A. MacDonald, J. Mergeay, M. Minter, D. O'Brien, I. Paz-Vinas, S. K. Pearson, S. Perez-Espona, K. Potter, I.-R. Russo, G. Segelbacher, C. Vernesi, M. E. Hunter
Abstract
Genetic diversity is critically important for all species-domesticated and wild- to adapt to environmental change, and for ecosystem resilience to extreme events. International agreements such as the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) have committed to conserve and sustainably and equitably use all levels of biodiversity-genes, species and ecosystems-globally. However, assessment and monitoring of genetic diversity are often overlooked, and there are large knowledge and policy gaps regarding genetic diversity conservation. In this study, we present the first quantitative analysis of genetic diversity assessments conducted by Parties to the CBD. We conducted a detailed, systematic analysis of 114 CBD 5th (submitted 2014) and 6th (submitted 2018) National Reports to quantitatively assess actions, progress on targets, values and indicators related to genetic diversity. First, we found that the importance of genetic diversity is recognised by most Parties to the CBD, and that recognition increased over time. However, genetic targets mainly addressed genetic diversity within cultivated plants, farm animals, and crop wild relatives, with little focus on other wild species. Also, actions for conserving genetic diversity primarily concerned ex-situ facilities and policy, rather than monitoring and intervention for maintaining genetic diversity in situ. The most commonly used indicators of genetic diversity status were the number of genetic resources in conservation facilities, number of threatened breeds, and Red List Index, which are not well correlated to genetic erosion in most species -- highlighting that genetic change is poorly monitored by current indicators. Lastly, analyses of genetic data observations, indigenous use and knowledge of genetic diversity, and strategies being developed and implemented to conserve genetic diversity are highly under-reported. We make several recommendations for the post-2020 CBD Biodiversity Framework to improve awareness, assessment, and monitoring, and facilitate consistent and complete reporting of progress of genetic diversity in future National Reports. Article Impact StatementAn analysis of genetic diversity in CBD National Reports neglects non-domesticated species and demonstrates need for sufficient indicators.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Practical application of indicators for genetic diversity in CBD post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework implementation
Henrik Thurfjell, Linda Laikre, … Per Sjögren‐Gulve·Ecological IndicatorsPeer-reviewed·Jul 16, 2022
- Challenges and opportunities for integrating genetic diversity monitoring in megadiverse countries: reflections from Mexico
Alicia Mastretta‐Yanes, Libertad Arredondo‐Amezcua, … Ana Wegier·bioRxiv·Oct 1, 2026
- Gaps in the global protection of terrestrial genetic diversity
Jana Tabea Schultz, Jonas Geldmann, … David Nogués‐Bravo·bioRxiv·Aug 23, 2024
- Conserving genetic diversity during climate change:Niche marginality and discrepant monitoring capacity in Europe
P. B. Pearman, O. Broennimann, … M. Bruford·bioRxiv·Mar 24, 2023
- Large future genetic diversity losses are predicted even with habitat protection
Kristy S. Mualim, Jeffrey P. Spence, … Moisés Expósito‐Alonso·bioRxiv·Oct 21, 2024
- Signals of consistent genetic diversity decline are not yet measurable in global meta-analysis
Moisés Expósito‐Alonso·bioRxiv·Aug 1, 2025