What's left in the tank? Identification of non-ascribed aquarium's coral collections with DNA barcodes as part of an integrated diagnostic approach
Luigi ColiniD, Daniel Abed‐NavandiiD, Dalia A. CondeiD, Jamie CraggsiD, Rita da SilvaiD, Max JanseiD, Björn KällströmiD, Alexander Pearce-Kelly, Chris YessoniD
Abstract
The unprecedented threats to coral reef ecosystems from global climate change (GCC) require an urgent response from the aquarium community, which is becoming an increasingly vital coral conservation resource. Unfortunately, many hermatypic corals in aquaria are not identified to species level, which hinders assessment of their conservation significance. Traditional methods of species identification using morphology can be challenging, especially to non-taxonomists. DNA barcoding is an option for species identification of Scleractinian corals, especially when used in concert with morphology-based assessment. This study uses DNA barcodes to try to identify aquarium specimens of the diverse reef-forming genus Acropora from 127 samples. We identified to our best current knowledge, to species name 44% of the analysed samples and provided provisional identification for 80% of them (101/127, in the form of a list of species names with associate confidence values). We highlighted a sampling bias in public nucleotide sequences repertories (e.g.: GenBank) towards more charismatic and more studied species, even inside a well-studied genus like Acropora. In addition, we showed a potential "single observer" effect with over a quarter of the reference sequences used for these identifications coming from the same study. We propose the use of barcoding and query matching as an additional tool for taxonomic experts and general aquarists, as an additional tool to increase their chances of making high confidence species-level identifications. We produce a standardised and easily repeatable methodology to increase the capacity of aquariums and other facilities to assess non-ascribed species, emphasising the value of integrating this approach with morphological identification optimising usage of authoritative identification guides and expert opinion.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 3
- FWCI
- 0.27
- Field percentile
- 46th percentile
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Comparing Approaches to Specimen Identification using Neotropical Freshwater Fishes in the Barra del Colorado Wildlife Refuge, Costa Rica
Taegan JM Perez, João Pedro Fontenelle, … Nathan R. Lovejoy·bioRxiv·Oct 2, 2023
- DNA fingerprinting: an effective tool for taxonomic identification of processed precious corals
B. Lendvay, L. E. Cartier, … N. V. Morf·bioRxiv·Oct 22, 2019
- From genome wide SNPs to genomic islands of differentiation: the quest for species diagnostic markers in two scleractinian corals, Pocillopora and Porites
R. Deshuraud, A. Ottaviani, … D. Forcioli·bioRxiv·Oct 21, 2022
- DNA from non-viable bacteria biases diversity estimates in the corals Acropora loripes and Pocillopora acuta
Ashley M. Dungan, Laura Geissler, … Madeleine J. H. van Oppen·bioRxiv·Nov 16, 2023
- Kinship and genetic variation in aquarium-spawned Acropora hyacinthus corals
E. H. Lopez-Nandam, C. Y. Payne, … R. Albright·bioRxiv·Oct 18, 2022
- From Genomics to Integrative Taxonomy? The Case Study of Pocillopora Corals
N. OURY, C. NOËL, … H. MAGALON·bioRxiv·Oct 4, 2022