A paradoxical misperception of relative motion

Abstract

Motion perception is considered a hyperacuity. The presence of a visual frame of reference to compute relative motion is necessary to achieve this sensitivity [Legge, Gordon E., and F. W. Campbell. "Displacement detection in human vision." Vision Research 21.2 (1981): 205-213.]. However, there is a special condition where humans are unable to accurately detect relative motion: images moving in a direction consistent with retinal slip where the motion is unnaturally amplified can, under some conditions, appear stable [Arathorn, David W., et al. "How the unstable eye sees a stable and moving world." Journal of Vision 13.10.22 (2013)]. In this study, we asked: Is world-fixed retinal image background content necessary for the visual system to compute the direction of eye motion to render in the percept images moving with amplified slip as stable? Or, are non-visual cues sufficient? Subjects adjusted the parameters of a stimulus moving in a random trajectory to match the perceived motion of images moving contingent to the retina. Experiments were done with and without retinal image background content. The perceived motion of stimuli moving with amplified retinal slip was suppressed in the presence of visual content; however, higher magnitudes of motion were perceived under conditions with no visual cues. Our results demonstrate that the presence of retinal image background content is essential for the visual system to compute its direction of motion. The visual content that might be thought to provide a strong frame of reference to detect amplified retinal slips, instead paradoxically drives the misperception of relative motion.