Resource limitation reveals a twofold benefit of eusociality
Emanuel A. Fronhofer, Jürgen Liebig, Oliver Mitesser, Hans Joachim Poethke
Abstract
Explaining the evolution and maintenance of cooperative breeding or eusociality remains a challenge. Surprisingly, fundamental ecological factors, specifically competition for limited resources and resource variance, are frequently ignored in models of animal sociality. We here develop a mathematical model that includes density-dependent population growth and quantify the influence of cooperative foraging on resource use efficiency. We derive optimal resource sharing strategies, ranging from egalitarian to cooperatively breeding and eusocial groups. We find that, while egalitarian resource sharing is a risk-reducing foraging strategy, eusociality yields additional benefits: like egalitarian strategies, eusocial groups can reduce their members starvation risk by reducing resource variance. Additionally, eusocial groups increase their reproductive output by increasing intra-group variance in resources allocated to reproduction. This allows reproduction even when resources are so scarce that solitary animals would not be able to reproduce. In a majority of environmental situations and life-histories, this twofold benefit of eusociality increased resource use efficiency and led to supersaturation, that is, to a strong increase in carrying capacity. Supersaturation provides indirect benefits to group members even for low intra-group relatedness and represents one potential explanation for the evolution and maintenance of eusociality and cooperative breeding.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Maternal manipulation of offspring size can trigger the evolution of eusociality in promiscuous species
E. Rees-Baylis, I. Pen, J. J. Kreider·bioRxiv·Jan 23, 2024
- Changes in group size during resource shifts reveal drivers of sociality across the tree of life
A. B. Kao, A. K. Hund, … H. F. McCreery·bioRxiv·Mar 17, 2020
- Variation in season length and development time is sufficient to drive the emergence and coexistence of social and solitary behavioral strategies
Dee M. Ruttenberg, Simon A. Levin, … Sarah D. Kocher·Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesPeer-reviewed·Oct 1, 2024
- Experimental evidence that animal societies vary in size due to sex differences in cooperation
J. Melgar, M. F. Schou, … C. K. Cornwallis·bioRxiv·Mar 1, 2022
- Spend today or build for tomorrow? Kinship dynamics and the evolution of alternative helping strategies in cooperative breeders.
Daniel W. E. Sankey, Matishalin Patel, … Theresa Rueger·bioRxiv·Sep 9, 2025
- Eusociality through conflict dissolution
M. Gonzalez-Forero, J. Pena·bioRxiv·Sep 29, 2020