Sign in
EcologyDeep Sea Research Part II Topical Studies in Oceanography
Peer-reviewed journal article

Analysis of environmental data during a lagrangian experiment: The influence of vertical movements.

Patricia Romero Fernández, Eulogio Vargas-García, Ricardo Borrego‐SantosiD, Raúl Laiz‐CarrióniD, J.M. Quintanilla-HervásiD, Michael R. LandryiD, Sven A. KranziD, Michael R. StukeliD, Thomas KellyiD, Manuel Vargas‐YáñeziD

Abstract

Investigating the time evolution of physical and biochemical properties of the ocean with in situ sampling can follow two approaches: Eulerian and Lagrangian. In the Eulerian approach, repeated measurements are taken at fixed locations, whereas the sampling point moves with the displacement of a water parcel in the Lagrangian approach. During the BLOOFINZ-IO cruise off northwest Australia, four Lagrangian experiments ("cycles") were conducted with multidisciplinary sampling done at regular intervals for several days following a satellite tracked drifter with mixed-layer drogue. To test the Lagrangian nature of these experiments, we adapted the Bindoff and McDougall (1994) approach for decomposing observed changes between adjacent CTD profiles into components due to vertical movement (heaving) and those occurring along isopycnal surfaces. Profile depth variability was mainly driven by vertical displacements of isopycnals (internal waves), while temperature, chlorophyll, oxygen and salinity were relatively stable when observed on isopycnal surfaces across all casts within the same cycle, and different on average between cycles. Our analysis clearly indicated that density surface was a more appropriate vertical coordinate than physical depth for assessing real environmental variability during each cycle and confirmed the Lagrangian character of the experiments. While the BLOOFINZ cruise serves as a case study, the methodology can be readily extended to analyze other biochemical variables in different ocean regions.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
0
FWCI
0.00
Field percentile
14th percentile

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.