bioRxivGeneticsPreprint
Leveraging allelic heterogeneity to increase power of association testing
Farhad HormozdiariiD, Junghyun JungiD, Eleazar EskiniD, Jong Wha J. JooiD
Abstract
The standard genome-wide association studies (GWAS) detects an association between a single variant and a phenotype of interest. Recently, several studies reported that at many risk loci, there may exist multiple causal variants. For a locus with multiple causal variants with small effect sizes, the standard association test is underpowered to detect the associations. Alternatively, an approach considering effects of multiple variants simultaneously may increase statistical power by leveraging effects of multiple causal variants. In this paper, we propose a new statistical method, Model-based Association test Reflecting causal Status (MARS), that tries to find an association between variants in risk loci and a phenotype, considering the causal status of the variants. One of the main advantages of MARS is that it only requires the existing summary statistics to detect associated risk loci. Thus, MARS is applicable to any association study with summary statistics, even though individual level data is not available for the study. Utilizing extensive simulated data sets, we show that MARS increases the power of detecting true associated risk loci compared to previous approaches that consider multiple variants, while robustly controls the type I error. Applied to data of 44 tissues provided by the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) consortium, we show that MARS identifies more eGenes compared to previous approaches in most of the tissues; e.g. MARS identified 16% more eGenes than the ones reported by the GTEx consortium. Moreover, applied to Northern Finland Birth Cohort (NFBC) data, we demonstrate that MARS effectively identifies association loci with improved power (56% of more loci found by MARS) inGWAS studies compared to the standard association test.
- organism: human
- assay: GWAS summary statistics
- research focus: GWAS / association mapping
- research focus: fine-mapping
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Identifying Causal Variants by Fine Mapping Across Multiple Studies
Nathan LaPierre, Kodi Taraszka, … Eleazar Eskin·PLoS GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Sep 20, 2021
- Principal component based adaptive association test of multiple traits using GWAS summary statistics
- The Multivariate Normal Distribution Framework for Analyzing Association Studies
Jose Antonio Lozano, Farhad Hormozdiari, … Eleazar Eskin·bioRxiv·Oct 28, 2017
- The more the merrier? Multivariate approaches to genome-wide association analysis
César-Reyer Vroom, Christiaan de Leeuw, … Sophie van der Sluis·bioRxiv·Apr 18, 2019
- Trait selection strategy in multi-trait GWAS: Boosting SNPs discoverability
Yuka Suzuki, Hervé Ménager, … Hanna Julienne·Human Genetics and Genomics AdvancesPeer-reviewed·Jun 13, 2024
- Local joint testing improves power and identifies missing heritability in association studies
Brielin C. Brown, Alkes L. Price, … Noah Zaitlen·bioRxiv·Feb 18, 2016