Genome diversification of symbiotic fungi in beetle-fungus mutualistic symbiosis
Yin‐Tse HuangiD, Khaled Abdrabo El‐Sayid AbdraboiD, Guan Jie PhangiD, Yu‐Hsuan Fan, Yuting WuiD, Jie‐Hao OuiD, Jiří HulcriD
Abstract
Ambrosia beetles and their fungal symbionts represent a widespread and diverse insect-fungus mutualism. This study investigates the genomic adaptations associated with the evolution of the ambrosia lifestyle across multiple fungal lineages. We performed comparative genomic analyses on 70 fungal genomes from four families (Irpicaceae, Ceratocystidaceae, Nectriaceae, and Ophiostomataceae), including 24 ambrosia and 34 non-ambrosia lineages. Our phylogenomic analyses reveal multiple independent colonization of insect vectors by the fungi, spanning from the mid-Cretaceous (114.6 Ma) to the early Quaternary (1.9 Ma). Contrary to expectations for obligate symbionts, ambrosia fungi showed no significant genome-wide reductions in size, gene count, or secreted protein repertoire compared to their non-symbiotic relatives. Instead, we observed conservation of most assessed genomic features; where genome traits differ between free-living relatives and ambrosia fungi, the changes are lineage-specific, not convergent. Key findings include lineage-specific expansions in carbohydrate-active enzyme families (AA4 in Nectriaceae, CE4 in Ophiostomataceae, and GH3 in Ophiostomataceae and Ceratocystidaceae), suggesting potential enhancement or loss of lignin modification, hemicellulose deacetylation, and cellulose degradation in different ambrosia lineages. Repeat-Induced Point mutation analysis revealed family-specific patterns rather than lifestyle-associated differences. These results highlight the diverse genomic strategies employed by ambrosia fungi, demonstrating that symbiont evolution can proceed through refined, lineage-specific changes rather than genome-wide, or convergent alterations. Unlike other insect-associated fungi, ambrosia fungi do not seem to be domesticated crops, but rather free-living fungi which co-opted wood boring beetles as vectors via subtle, lineage-specific adaptations.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 6
- FWCI
- 2.70
- Field percentile
- top 11%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Why Ambrosia Beetles Keep Only One Fungus: Competitive Asymmetry, Bottleneck Drift, and Eco-Evolutionary Fixation
Zi‐Ru Jiang·bioRxiv·Dec 21, 2025
- Fulfilling Koch-like postulates for animal fungal mutualists: New fungal symbionts and gallery and mycangial colonization by Xyleborus affinis ambrosia fungi
Abolfazl Masoudi, Esther Tirmizi, … Nemat O. Keyhani·Environmental MicrobiologyPeer-reviewed·Jun 1, 2026
- Diffuse fungal symbiosis in Deathwatch beetles
Austin Hendricks, T. Keith Philips, … Vincent G. Martinson·bioRxiv·Aug 11, 2026
- Growth variation of an ambrosia fungus on different tree species indicates host specialization
Marcel Hugo Decker, Peter H. W. Biedermann, … Jon Andreja Nuotclà·Frontiers in Insect SciencePeer-reviewed·Dec 16, 2025
- Genome reshuffling as a route to specialization? Chromosome-level insights from the bark beetle symbiont genus Geosmithia.
Tereza Veselská, Miroslav Kolařík, Ryan Bracewell·bioRxiv·Sep 21, 2026
- Secondary metabolites and their impact on symbiotic interactions in the ambrosia fungus Geosmithia eupagioceri
Miroslav Kolařík, Eva Stodůlková, … Miroslav Flieger·Fungal ecologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 10, 2025