A burning question: Can savannah fire management generate enough carbon revenue to help save the lion from extinction?
T. Tear, N. H. Wolff, G. L. Lipsett-Moore, M. E. Ritchie, N. S. Ribeiro, L. S. Petracca, P. A. Lindsey, L. Hunter, A. J. Loveridge, F. Steinbruch
Abstract
Lions (Panthera leo) in Africa have lost nearly half their population in just the last two decades, and effective management of the protected areas (PAs) where lions live will cost an estimated USD >$1 B/year in new funding. We explore the potential for launching a fire management and habitat restoration carbon-financing program to help fill this PA management funding gap. We demonstrate how introducing early dry season fire management programs could produce potential carbon revenues (PCR) from either a single carbon-financing method (avoided emissions) or from multiple sequestration methods of USD $59.6-$655.9 M/year (at USD $5/ton) or USD $155.0 M-$1.7 B/year (at USD $13/ton). We highlight variable but significant PCR for PAs with the greatest potential for restoring lion numbers between USD $1.5-$44.4 M per PA. We suggest investing in lion-centric fire management programs to jump-start the United Nations Decade of Ecological Restoration and help preserve African lions across their range. SCIENCE FOR SOCIETYThe United Nations recently launched the Decade of Ecological Restoration in response to planet-wide land degradation. This study analyses the potential for savanna fire management programs to restore fire regimes that can generate new sources of revenue from carbon financing for chronically under-funded protected areas in Africa with lions, as lions are a key indicator of savanna ecosystem health. We estimated the amount of carbon saved by shifting fires that normally burn in the late dry season (and emit more carbon) to the early dry season (that accrue more carbon in the soil and woody vegetation). Based on current carbon market values we found substantial potential to eliminate or significantly reduce the $>1B annual funding gap needed to save the lion from extinction. Given additional benefits for nature and people from new savanna fire programs, we recommend integrated conservation and development projects direct more funding to some of the least developed countries with high biodiversity and support fire management programs in Africa.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Research Focus
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Valuation of carbon services produced by wild animals finances conservation
F. Berzaghi, R. Chami, … C. Fullenkamp·bioRxiv·Oct 19, 2021
- Traditional practices, knowledge and perceptions of fire use in a West African savanna parkland
E. E. Amoako, J. Gambiza·bioRxiv·Sep 24, 2020
- Seasonal land use land cover change and the drivers in Kafta-Sheraro National Park, Tigray, Ethiopia
F. temesgen, B. D. Warkineh, A. M. Hailemicael·bioRxiv·Sep 29, 2021
- Demographic impacts of low- and high-intensity fire in a riparian savanna bird: implications for ecological fire management
N. Teunissen, H. McAlpine, … A. Peters·bioRxiv·Dec 10, 2022
- Islands of hope in the Sahel: farmer-managed grazing exclusions restore biodiversity and boost livelihoods
Gabriel Marcacci, Roland R. Kaboré, … Alain Jacot·bioRxiv·Jan 17, 2026
- Combined interventions are required to reverse biodiversity and carbon losses in tropical forest frontiers
Leonardo Miranda, James R. Thomson, … Jos Barlow·bioRxiv·Nov 4, 2025