bioRxivPathology
Accurate recognition of colorectal cancer with semi-supervised deep learning on pathological images
G. Yu, T. Xie, C. Xu, X.-H. Shi, C. Wu, K. Sun, R.-Q. Meng, X.-H. Meng, K.-S. Wang, H.-M. Xiao, H.-W. Deng
Abstract
BackgroundMachine-assisted recognition of colorectal cancer (CRC) has been mainly focused on supervised deep learning that suffers from a significant bottleneck of requiring massive labeled data. We hypothesize that semi-supervised deep learning leveraging a small amount of labeled data with abundant available unlabeled data can provide a powerful alternative strategy. MethodWe proposed a semi-supervised model based on the mean teacher architecture that provides pathological predictions at both patch- and patient-levels. We demonstrated the general utility of the model utilizing 13,111 CRC whole slide images from 8,803 subjects gathered from 13 independent centers. We compared our proposed method with the prevailing supervised learning and six pathologists. Two extended evaluations on 15,000 lung and 294,912 lymph node images were also performed to confirm the generality of utility of semi-supervised learning for different cancers. ResultsWith a small amount of labeled training patches ([~]3,150 labeled, [~]40,950 unlabeled or [~]6,300 labeled, [~]37,800 unlabeled), the semi-supervised learning (SSL) performed significantly better than the supervised learning (SL, which only used the labeled data) (area under the curve, AUC: 0.90 {+/-} 0.06 vs. 0.84 {+/-} 0.07, P value = 0.02 or AUC: 0.98 {+/-} 0.01 vs. 0.92 {+/-} 0.04, P value = 0.0004). Moreover, we found no significant difference between SL using massive [~]44,100 labeled patches and SSL ([~]6,300 labeled, [~]37,800 unlabeled) at patch-level diagnoses (AUC:0.98 {+/-} 0.01 vs. 0.987 {+/-} 0.01, P value = 0.134) and patient-level diagnoses (average AUC: 0.974 vs. 0.980, P value = 0.117). SSL was close to human pathologists in diagnosis performance (average AUC: 0.972 vs. 0.969). This extended evaluation on lung and lymph node also confirmed when a small amount of labeled data were used, SSL was better than SL, and achieved similar performance as that of SL with massive labeling. ConclusionsWe reported that SSL can achieve excellent performance through a multi-center study. Because SSL dramatically reduces the need and cost of pathological image annotation, it has great potential to effectively build pathological artificial intelligence (AI) platforms in practice.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Accurate Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer Based on Histopathology Images Using Artificial Intelligence
K.-S. Wang, G. Yu, … H.-W. Deng·bioRxiv·Mar 15, 2020
- Deep Learning-Based Classification of Colorectal Cancer in Histopathology Images for Category Detection
Thang Truong Le, Vinh-Thuyen Nguyen-Truong, … Kiep Thi Quang·Biology Methods and ProtocolsPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2025
- Image-based consensus molecular subtype classification (imCMS) of colorectal cancer using deep learning
K. Sirinukunwattana, E. Domingo, … V. Koelzer·bioRxiv·May 23, 2019
- ARA: accurate, reliable and active histopathological image classification framework with Bayesian deep learning
Alicja Rączkowska, Marcin Możejko, … Ewa Szczurek·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Oct 4, 2019
- Deep learning models for poorly differentiated colorectal adenocarcinoma classification in whole slide images using transfer learning
M. Tsuneki, F. Kanavati·bioRxiv·May 31, 2021
- Enhancing Medical Image Segmentation through Negative Sample Integration: A Study on Kvasir-SEG and Augmented Datasets
Imon Mahbub, Ahmed Zoha Zim, … Md. Mehedi Hasan Shawon·bioRxiv·Oct 14, 2025