bioRxivGeneticsPreprint
eXclusionarY: Ten years later, where are the sex chromosomes in GWAS?
Lei SuniD, Zhong WangiD, Tianyuan LuiD, Teri A. ManolioiD, Andrew D. PatersoniD
Abstract
Ten years ago, a detailed analysis of genome-wide association studies showed that only 33% of the studies included the X chromosome. Multiple recommendations were made to combat eXclusion. Here we re-surveyed the research landscape to determine if these earlier recommendations had been translated. Unfortunately, among the summary statistics reported in 2021 in the NHGRI-EBI GWAS catalog, only 25% provided results for the X chromosome and 3% for the Y chromosome, suggesting that the eXclusion phenomenon documented earlier not only persists but has also expanded into an eXclusionarY problem. Normalizing by physical length of the chromosome, the average number of studies published until 11/29/22 with genome-wide significant findings on the X chromosome is ~1 study/Mb. In contrast, it ranges from ~6 to ~16 studies/Mb for chromosomes 4 and 19, respectively. Compared with the autosomal growth rate of ~0.086 studies/Mb/year over the last decade, studies of the X chromosome grew at less than one-seventh that rate, only ~0.012 studies/Mb/year. Among the studies that reported significant association on the X chromosome, there were extreme heterogeneities in how they analyzed the data and documented the results, suggesting the need for guidelines. Not surprisingly, among the 430 scores sampled from the PolyGenic Score catalog, 0% contained weights for sex chromosomal SNPs. To overcome the dearth of sex chromosome analyses, we provide five sets of recommendations and future directions. Finally, until the sex chromosomes are included in a whole-genome study, instead of GWAS, we propose they be more properly referred to as "AWAS" for "autosome-wide scan".
- organism: human
- assay: GWAS summary statistics
- research focus: GWAS / association mapping
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: fine-mapping
- approach: benchmark study
- Citations
- 3
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Why are GWASs limp about the X chromosome?
I. P. Gorlov, C. Amos·bioRxiv·Oct 11, 2022
- XWAS: a software toolset for genetic data analysis and association studies of the X chromosome
Feng Gao, Diana Chang, … Alon Keinan·Journal of HeredityPeer-reviewed·Aug 12, 2015
- GXwasR: A Toolkit for Investigating Sex-Differentiated Genetic Effects on Complex Traits
Banabithi Bose, Freida Blostein, … Barbara E. Stranger·medRxiv·Jun 10, 2025
- Analytical strategies to include the X-chromosome in variance heterogeneity analyses: evidence for trait-specific polygenic variance structure
Wei Q. Deng, Shihong Mao, … Lei Sun·Genetic EpidemiologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 22, 2019
- Accounting for eXentricities: Analysis of the X chromosome in GWAS reveals X-linked genes implicated in autoimmune diseases
Diana Chang, Feng Gao, … Alon Keinan·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Dec 5, 2014
- Concerning the eXclusion in human genomics: The choice of sex chromosome representation in the human genome drastically affects number of identified variants
Brendan J. Pinto, Brian D. O’Connor, … Melissa A. Wilson·G3 Genes Genomes GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jul 27, 2023