bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Sparse mixed codes on shared manifolds for human-like spatial attention in artificial neural networks
Abstract
Spatial attention is often partitioned into endogenous, exogenous, and social forms, yet it remains unclear whether a single neural circuit can support all three and how their population codes are organized. Here we trained recurrent artificial neural networks (ANNs) with convolutional sensory front-ends on three classic cueing paradigms (central, peripheral, and gaze cues) to reproduce human reaction time (RT) profiles across cue-target onset asynchronies. Despite differences in sensory architecture and visual experience, all ANNs captured the full facilitation-inhibition time course for all three attention types. Model-based targeted dimensionality reduction (mTDR) revealed that cue- and choice-related activity in the advanced cognitive module evolved as rotations within a shared low-dimensional manifold, with angular deflections that mirrored the distinct temporal dynamics of endogenous, exogenous, and social attention. Attentional signals were encoded by highly sparse, distributed population activity: a small subset of recurrent units explained most task-related variance, was sufficient to recover human-like RT patterns after virtual lesioning, and became progressively sparser as training improved performance. At the same time, single unit responses displayed pervasive mixed selectivity, dominated by nonlinear conjunctions of cue type, cue direction, and validity, whose strength and heterogeneity robustly predicted model performance. Together, these results identified low-dimensional geometric rotations, sparse coding, and nonlinear mixed selectivity as core computational principles through which a single recurrent circuit could generate human-like temporal dynamics across endogenous, exogenous, and social orienting, and provided testable predictions for population-level mechanisms of spatial attention in the brain.
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A Neuroscience-Inspired Spiking Neural Network for Auditory Spatial Attention Detection Using Single-Trial EEG
Faramarz Faghihi, Siqi Cai, Ahmed A. Moustafa·bioRxiv·May 25, 2021
- Leveraging spiking deep neural networks to understand the neural mechanisms underlying selective attention
Lynn K. A. Sörensen, Davide Zambrano, … H. Steven Scholte·Journal of Cognitive NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 21, 2022
- From Attention Control to Stimulus Selection: Neural Mechanisms Revealed by Multivariate Pattern and Functional Connectivity Analyses
Qiang Yang, Sreenivasan Meyyappan, … Mingzhou Ding·bioRxiv·Apr 14, 2026
- Spatial and feature-selective attention interact to drive selective coding in frontoparietal cortex
Nadene Dermody, Romy Lorenz, … Alexandra Woolgar·NeuropsychologiaPeer-reviewed·May 21, 2025
- Neural mechanisms of attention, not expectation, govern spatial selection by probabilistic cueing
Sricharan Sunder, Kavya Rajendran, … Devarajan Sridharan·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Aug 5, 2025
- Neural Mechanisms of Willed Attention Control
Changhao Xiong, Yujun Chen, … Mingzhou Ding·bioRxiv·Aug 24, 2026