One placement, many fields: robust voxel-wise mapping with multichannel TMS
Ole NumsseniD, Renxiang QiuiD, Victor Hugo SouzaiD, Mikael LaineiD, Renan H. MatsudaiD, Lena Buchberger, Carla W. Martin, Konstantin WeiseiD, Thomas R. KnöscheiD
Abstract
Understanding the human brain at the individual level is central to understanding its function and a prerequisite for personalized therapy. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can map structure-function relationships at high resolution by regressing trial-wise variation in the TMS-induced electric field (E-field) against a response such as motor evoked potentials (MEPs). This requires distinct E-fields across pulses at different cortical locations, which single-coil TMS (sTMS) achieves by physically repositioning the coil (typically supported by neuronavigation software such as InVesalius Navigator; Souza et al., 2018)--increasingly reliant on robotic guidance and capped by the coil geometry. Multichannel TMS (mTMS) instead steers the E-field electronically via independent currents in several coils, opening a design space of high variability without physical repositioning. We adapt determinant-based sequence optimization from discrete sTMS coil-placement sets to the continuous mTMS current space (D-optimal design), identifying pulse sequences whose induced cortical E-fields are as mutually dissimilar as biophysical constraints allow. We benchmarked optimized mTMS sequences against random baselines and optimized sTMS placements in virtual motor mapping across multiple head models, assessing three mTMS array geometries (5-channel planar, 6- and 12-channel spherical), two figure-of-eight sTMS coils, and varying pulse counts, response noise, and cortical depth. D-optimal mTMS currents substantially outperformed random currents and optimized sTMS at matched pulse counts. The gain was modest without noise but increased significantly with it: at the highest noise level, optimized sTMS failed to converge after 100 pulses (~20-22 mm error), whereas all mTMS arrays reached median errors at or below 6 mm. mTMS also recovered deep targets better than sTMS (up to 35 mm skin-cortex distance, versus 25 mm) and performed uniformly across the region of interest. A coil-space scheme based only on the magnetic vector potential, precomputable once per array without per-subject MRI, captured most of the benefit, matching subject-specific optimization at 100 pulses. mTMS thus makes voxel-wise mapping robust throughout a region of interest without coil repositioning.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Optimal Pre-Experimental Coil Sequence Selection for TMS Motor Mapping
Renxiang Qiu, Ole Numssen, … Thomas R. Knösche·bioRxiv·Jul 5, 2026
- Optimizing and assessing multichannel TMS focality
Ole Numssen, Carla W. Martin, … Thomas R. Knösche·Brain stimulationPeer-reviewed·Feb 12, 2026
- Efficient high-resolution TMS mapping of the human motor cortex by nonlinear regression
Ole Numssen, Anna Leah Zier, … Konstantin Weise·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Oct 13, 2021
- A novel approach to localize cortical TMS effects
Konstantin Weise, Ole Numssen, … Thomas R. Knösche·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Dec 23, 2019
- Multi-locus transcranial magnetic stimulation system for electronically targeted brain stimulation
Jaakko O. Nieminen, Heikki Sinisalo, … Risto Juhani Ilmoniemi·Brain stimulationPeer-reviewed·Nov 21, 2021
- Fast computational optimization of TMS coil placement for individualized electric field targeting
L. Gomez, M. Dannhauer, A. V. Peterchev·bioRxiv·May 27, 2020