Frontiers in NeuroscienceNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Quantification of Phase-Amplitude Coupling in Neuronal Oscillations: Comparison of Phase-Locking Value, Mean Vector Length, and Modulation Index
Mareike HülsemanniD, Dr. rer. nat, Ewald Naumann, Dr. rer. nat, Björn RaschiD
Abstract
Phase-amplitude coupling is a promising construct to study cognitive processes in electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetencephalography (MEG). Due to the novelty of the concept, various measures are used in the literature to calculate phase-amplitude coupling. Here, performance of the three most widely used phase-amplitude coupling measures - phase-locking value (PLV), mean vector length (MVL), and modulation index (MI) - is thoroughly compared with the help of simulated data. We combine advantages of previous reviews and use a realistic data simulation, examine moderators and provide inferential statistics for the comparison of all three indices of phase-amplitude coupling. Our analyses show that all three indices successfully differentiate coupling strength and coupling width when monophasic coupling is present. While the mean vector length was most sensitive to modulations in coupling strengths and width, biphasic coupling can solely be detected by the modulation index. Coupling values of all three indices were influenced by moderators including data length, signal-to-noise-ratio, and sampling rate when approaching Nyquist frequencies. The modulation index was most robust against confounding influences of these moderators. Based on our analyses, we recommend the modulation index for noisy and short data epochs with unknown forms of coupling. For high quality and long data epochs with monophasic coupling and a high signal-to-noise ratio, the use of the mean vector length is recommended. Ideally, both indices are reported simultaneously for one data set.\n\nHighlightsO_LImean vector length is most sensitive for differentiating coupling strength\nC_LIO_LImodulation index is most robust to differences in data length, sampling rate and SNR\nC_LIO_LIphase-locking value and mean vector length cannot detect biphasic phase-amplitude coupling\nC_LI
- Citations
- 204
- FWCI
- 10.34
- Field percentile
- top 1%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Modulation index-based phase-amplitude coupling does not encode temporal polarity
Mahmoud Keshavarzi·bioRxiv·Jun 22, 2026
- Direct Modulation Index: a measure of phase amplitude coupling for neurophysiology data
Maximilian Scherer, Tianlu Wang, … Alireza Gharabaghi·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Dec 29, 2022
- Dissociated cortical phase- and amplitude-coupling patterns in the human brain
Marcus Siems, Markus Siegel·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Jan 11, 2020
- Measuring phase-amplitude coupling opposition in neurophysiological signals with the Mean Opposition Vector Index (MOVI)
Ludovico Saint-Amour di Chanaz, Alexis Pérez-Bellido, Lluís Fuentemilla·bioRxiv·Aug 4, 2023
- Computing the geometry of phase-amplitude coupling: A new moment-based framework
Mahmoud Keshavarzi, Usha Goswami·bioRxiv·Sep 21, 2026
- Mathematical relations between measures of brain connectivity estimated from electrophysiological recordings for Gaussian distributed data
Guido Nolte, Edgar E. Galindo-Leon, … Andreas Karl Engel·Frontiers in NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Nov 10, 2020