A dimensional link between gain-loss economic preferences and psychopathology
Abstract
Human decision-makers differ in how they value and trade off reward, risk, and information when evaluating future gains and losses, and these preferences are central to well-being. However, how multi-attribute economic valuation relates to psychopathology remains unclear. Here, 1,954 individuals completed a transdiagnostic symptom battery and a multi-attribute decision-making task that independently manipulated expected reward, reward uncertainty, and non-instrumental information under matched gain and loss contexts. On average, when choosing among gains, participants preferred larger rewards, avoided risk, and sought advance information. When choosing among losses, they still preferred better outcomes and advance information, but less strongly. Their risk preference, by contrast, reversed, from risk-averse to risk-seeking. Substantial individual variability accompanied these population-level context effects, and different patterns of variability were associated with separate dimensions of psychopathology. Anxious-depressive and social withdrawal symptoms were associated with increased reward sensitivity across contexts, whereas compulsive-intrusive symptoms were associated with reduced reward sensitivity. Symptom-related differences in risk and information preferences were not fully explained by a uniform scaling of overall economic sensitivity, revealing additional attribute- and context-specific variation. A data-driven analysis summarized these symptom-preference associations in a single latent dimension that contrasted compulsive-intrusive symptoms with anxious-depressive and social withdrawal symptoms. An independently identified subgroup that strongly sought information about gains but avoided it about losses mirrored this profile and was enriched for compulsive-intrusive symptoms. These findings reveal structured, low-dimensional variation linking multi-attribute decision-making to psychopathology and could support a dimensional, task-based approach to psychiatric nosology.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Valuation in major depression is intact and stable in a non-learning environment
Dongil Chung, Kelly Kadlec, … Pearl H Chiu·bioRxiv·Sep 23, 2016
- Neuroticism Impairs the Use of Reward Values for Decision-Making in Major Depression
Samuel Rupprechter, Aistis Stankevicius, … Peggy Seriès·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Sep 10, 2018
- Attenuation of value-to-evidence translation drives biased decision making in anxiety and depression
Mrugsen Nagsen Gopnarayan, Sheng Feng, … Arjun Ramakrishnan·bioRxiv·Jun 11, 2026
- Anxious and obsessive-compulsive traits are independently associated with valuation of non-instrumental information
D. Bennett, K. Sutcliffe, … S. Bode·bioRxiv·May 5, 2020
- Attentional priority and limbic activity favor gains over losses
Kesong Hu, Eve De Rosa, Adam Keith Anderson·bioRxiv·Aug 12, 2024
- Feature-based valuation and its impairment in people with compulsive and addictive symptoms
Morgan G. Moll, Ryan K Read, Thomas W. Elston·bioRxiv·Sep 1, 2026