MISPEL: A supervised deep learning harmonizationmethod for multi-scanner neuroimaging data
Mahbaneh Eshaghzadeh TorbatiiD, Davneet Singh MinhasiD, Charles M. LaymoniD, Pauline MaillardiD, James David WilsoniD, Chang‐Le CheniD, Ciprian M. CrainiceanuiD, Charles S DeCarliiD, Seong Jae HwangiD, Dana TudorascuiD
Abstract
Large-scale data obtained from aggregation of already collected multi-site neuroimaging datasets has brought benefits such as higher statistical power, reliability, and robustness to the studies. Despite these promises from growth in sample size, substantial technical variability stemming from differences in scanner specifications exists in the aggregated data and could inadvertently bias any downstream analyses on it. Such a challenge calls for data normalization and/or harmonization frameworks, in addition to comprehensive criteria to estimate the scanner-related variability and evaluate the harmonization frameworks. In this study, we propose MISPEL (Multi-scanner Image harmonization via Structure Preserving Embedding Learning), a supervised multi-scanner harmonization method that is naturally extendable to more than two scanners. We also designed a set of criteria to investigate the scanner-related technical variability and evaluate the harmonization techniques. As an essential requirement of our criteria, we introduced a multi-scanner matched dataset of 3T T1 images across four scanners, which, to the best of our knowledge is one of the few datasets of this kind. We also investigated our evaluations using two popular segmentation frameworks: FSL and segmentation in statistical parametric mapping (SPM). Lastly, we compared MISPEL to popular methods of normalization and harmonization, namely White Stripe, RAVEL, and CALAMITI. MISPEL outperformed these methods and is promising for many other neuroimaging modalities.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 24
- FWCI
- 3.95
- Field percentile
- top 5%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A resource for development and comparison of multi-modal brain 3T MRI harmonisation approaches
Shaun Warrington, Asante Ntata, … Stamatios N. Sotiropoulos·Imaging NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Nov 20, 2023
- Intensity Warping for multisite MRI Harmonization
Julia Wrobel, Melissa L. Martin, … on behalf of the NAIMS Cooperative·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Aug 13, 2020
- Removal of Scanner Effects in Covariance Improves Multivariate Pattern Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
Andrew A. Chen, Joanne C. Beer, … The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Dec 14, 2021
- Deep Learning-Based Unlearning of Dataset Bias for MRI Harmonisation and Confound Removal
Nicola K. Dinsdale, Mark Jenkinson, Ana I. L. Namburete·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Dec 29, 2020
- RELIEF: a structured multivariate approach for removal of latent inter-scanner effects
Rongqian Zhang, Lindsay D. Oliver, … Jun Young Park·Imaging NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Aug 1, 2023
- Style Transfer Generative Adversarial Networks to Harmonize Multi-Site MRI to a Single Reference Image to Avoid Over-Correction
Mengting Liu, Alyssa H. Zhu, … Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Jul 20, 2023