Journal of NeurophysiologyNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Confidence in predicted position error explains saccadic decisions during pursuit
Abstract
A fundamental problem in motor control is the coordination of complementary movement types to achieve a common goal. As a common example, humans view moving objects through coordinated pursuit and saccadic eye movements. Pursuit is initiated and continuously controlled by retinal image velocity. During pursuit, eye position may lag behind the target. This can be compensated by the discrete execution of a catch-up saccade. The decision to trigger a saccade is influenced by both position and velocity errors and the timing of saccades can be highly variable. The observed distributions of saccade occurrence and trigger time remain poorly understood and this decision process remains imprecisely quantified. Here we propose a predictive, probabilistic model explaining the decision to trigger saccades during pursuit to foveate moving targets. In this model, expected position error and its associated uncertainty are predicted through Bayesian inference across noisy, delayed sensory observations (Kalman filtering). This probabilistic prediction is used to estimate the confidence that a saccade is needed (quantified through log-probability ratio), triggering a saccade upon accumulating to a fixed threshold. The model qualitatively explains behavioural observations on the probability of occurrence and trigger time distributions of saccades during pursuit over a range of target motion trajectories. Furthermore, this model makes novel predictions about the influence of sensory uncertainty and target motion parameters on saccade decisions. We suggest that this predictive, confidence-based decision making strategy represents a fundamental principle for the probabilistic neural control of coordinated movements.\n\nNew & NoteworthyThis is the first stochastic dynamical systems model of pursuit-saccade coordination accounting for noise and delays in the sensorimotor system. The model uses Bayesian inference to predictively estimate visual motion, triggering saccades when confidence in predicted position error accumulates to a threshold. This model explains saccade probability and trigger time distributions across target trajectories and makes novel predictions about the influence of sensory uncertainty in saccade decisions during pursuit.
- Citations
- 6
- FWCI
- 0.27
- Field percentile
- top 46%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Timing and Amplitude of Catch-up Saccades to Accelerating Targets
Sydney Doré, Jonathan Coutinho, … Gunnar Blohm·bioRxiv·Jan 11, 2024
- In pursuit of saccade awareness: Limited control and minimal conscious access to catch-up saccades during smooth pursuit eye movements.
Jan-Nikolas Klanke, Sven Ohl, … Martin Rolfs·Journal of VisionPeer-reviewed·Jun 25, 2026
- A displacement and velocity based dual model of saccadic eye movements best explains kinematic variability
V Varsha, Radhakant Padhi, Aditya Murthy·bioRxiv·Mar 19, 2020
- A velocity plan with internal feedback control best explains modulation of saccade kinematics during eye-hand coordination.
V Varsha, Atul Gopal, … Aditya Murthy·bioRxiv·Oct 8, 2020
- Action history and target uncertainty co-determine human reaching direction under time pressure
Brendan Keane, L Smith, Timothy J. Carroll·bioRxiv·Dec 17, 2023
- Weighted integration of short term memory and sensory signals in the oculomotor system
Nicolas Deravet, Gunnar Blohm, … Philippe Lefèvre·Journal of VisionPeer-reviewed·May 29, 2018