bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Timing and Amplitude of Catch-up Saccades to Accelerating Targets
Sydney DoréiD, Jonathan CoutinhoiD, Emma Brooks, Aarlenne Zein KhaniD, Philippe LefèvreiD, Gunnar BlohmiD
- Citations
- 0
Abstract
To track moving targets, humans move their eyes using both saccades and smooth pursuit. If pursuit eye movements fail to accurately track the moving target, catch-up saccades are initiated to rectify the tracking error. It is well known that retinal position and velocity errors determine saccade timing and amplitude, but the extent to which retinal acceleration error influences these aspects is not well quantified. To test this, 13 adult human participants performed an experiment where they pursued accelerating / decelerating targets. During ongoing pursuit, we introduced a randomly sized target step to evoke a catch-up saccade and analyzed its timing and amplitude. We observed that retinal acceleration error was a statistically significant predictor of saccade amplitude and timing. A multiple linear regression supported our hypothesis that retinal acceleration errors influence saccade amplitude in addition to the influence of retinal position and velocity errors. We also found that saccade latencies were shorter when retinal acceleration error increased the tracking error and vice versa. In summary, our findings support a model in which retinal acceleration error is used to compute a predicted position error [~]100ms into the future to trigger saccades and determine saccade amplitude. Significance statementWhen visually tracking object motion, humans combine smooth pursuit and saccadic eye movements to maintain the target image on the fovea. Retinal position and velocity errors are known to determine catch-up saccade amplitude and timing, however it is unknown if retinal acceleration error is also used to predict future target position. This study provides evidence of a small but statistically significant contribution of retinal acceleration error in determining saccade amplitude and timing.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Confidence in predicted position error explains saccadic decisions during pursuit
Jonathan Coutinho, Philippe Lefèvre, Gunnar Blohm·Journal of NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Dec 23, 2020
- Intra-saccadic motion streaks jump-start gaze correction
Richard Schweitzer, Martin Rolfs·Science AdvancesPeer-reviewed·Jul 23, 2021
- Humans can track but fail to predict accelerating objects
Philipp Kreyenmeier, Luca Kämmer, … Miriam Spering·eNeuroPeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2022
- In pursuit of saccade awareness: Limited control and minimal conscious access to catch-up saccades during smooth pursuit eye movements.
Jan-Nikolas Klanke, Sven Ohl, … Martin Rolfs·Journal of VisionPeer-reviewed·Jun 25, 2026
- Eye-position error influence over \"open-loop\" smooth pursuit initiation
Antimo Buonocore, Julianne Skinner, Ziad M. Hafed·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Feb 1, 2019
- High-fidelity but hypometric spatial localization of afterimages across saccades
Richard Schweitzer, Thomas Seel, … Martin Rolfs·Science AdvancesPeer-reviewed·Mar 13, 2026