Too bad to be fraud, Midjourney has yet to embark in science.
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) promises great benefits for data management, for image analysis, and for new discovery, but also creates unprecedented potential for fraud. This brief study explores whether images created by AI pose a threat to the integrity of figures in scientific publications. An attempt was made to use a leading AI image-generation engine, Midjourney, to create plausible facsimiles of images that are commonly depicted in manuscripts in the biological sciences. We conclude that a widely available AI for generated images is not a threat to integrity, yet, but may be in the near future.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Experts fail to reliably detect AI-generated histological data
J. Hartung, S. Reuter, … R. Mrowka·bioRxiv·Jan 23, 2024
- Does charging for corrections in the bioscience literature disincentivize pre-publication handling of problematic image data? An ImageTwin-AI study.
Paul S. Brookes·bioRxiv·Jan 28, 2026
- Emerging Concern of Scientific Fraud: Deep Learning and Image Manipulation
- Fine-Grained Detection of AI-Generated Writing in the Biomedical Literature
Richard She·bioRxiv·Jan 5, 2026
- The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications
Elisabeth M Bik, Arturo Casadevall, Ferric C Fang·bioRxiv·May 17, 2016
- Why Do Scientists Fabricate And Falsify Data? A Matched-Control Analysis Of Papers Containing Problematic Image Duplications
D. Fanelli, R. Costas, … E. M. Bik·bioRxiv·Apr 12, 2017