Reporting animal research: Explanation and Elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2019
N. Percie du Sert, A. Ahluwalia, S. Alam, M. T. Avey, M. Baker, W. Browne, A. Clark, I. C. Cuthill, U. Dirnagl, M. Emerson, P. Garner, S. T. Holgate, D. W. Howells, V. Hurst, N. A. Karp, K. Lidster, C. J. MacCallum, M. Macleod, E. J. Pearl, O. Petersen, F. Rawle, P. Reynolds, K. Rooney, E. S. Sena, S. D. Silberberg, , H. Würbel
Abstract
Improving the reproducibility of biomedical research is a major challenge. Transparent and accurate reporting are vital to this process; it allows readers to assess the reliability of the findings, and repeat or build upon the work of other researchers. The NC3Rs developed the ARRIVE guidelines in 2010 to help authors and journals identify the minimum information necessary to report in publications describing in vivo experiments.\n\nDespite widespread endorsement by the scientific community, the impact of the ARRIVE guidelines on the transparency of reporting in animal research publications has been limited. We have revised the ARRIVE guidelines to update them and facilitate their use in practice. The revised guidelines are published alongside this paper. This Explanation and Elaboration document was developed as part of the revision. It provides further information about each of the 21 items in ARRIVE 2019, including the rationale and supporting evidence for their inclusion in the guidelines, elaboration of details to report, and examples of good reporting from the published literature.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The ARRIVE guidelines 2019: updated guidelines for reporting animal research
N. Percie du Sert, V. Hurst, … H. Würbel·bioRxiv·Jul 15, 2019
- A randomised controlled trial of an Intervention to Improve Compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines (IICARus)
K. Hair, M. R. Macleod, … The IICARus Collaboration·bioRxiv·Aug 28, 2018
- Findings of a retrospective, controlled cohort study of the impact of a change in Nature journals' editorial policy for life sciences research on the completeness of reporting study design and execution
Malcolm Robert Macleod, The NPQIP Collaborative group·bioRxiv·Sep 12, 2017
- Rigor and Transparency Index, a new metric of quality for assessing biological and medical science methods.
J. Menke, M. Roelandse, … A. E. Bandrowski·bioRxiv·Jan 15, 2020
- Reproducibility2020: Progress and Priorities
L. Freedman, G. Venugopalan, R. Wisman·bioRxiv·Feb 16, 2017
- Analysis of Practices to Promote Reproducibility and Transparency in Anaesthesiology Research: Are Important Aspects Hidden Behind the Drapes?