Validity and reliability of Kinect v2 for quantifying upper body kinematics during seated reaching

BackgroundKinematic analysis of the upper limbs is a good way to assess and monitor recovery in individuals with stroke, but remains little used in clinical routine due to its low feasibility. The aim of this study is to assess the validity and reliability of the Kinect v2 for the assessment of 17 kinematic variables commonly used in the analysis of upper limb reaching in stroke. Methods26 healthy participants performed seated hand-reaching tasks while holding a dumbbell to induce a behaviour similar to that of a person with a stroke. 3D upper limb and trunk motion were simultaneously recorded with the Kinect v2 (Microsoft, USA) and with the VICON (OxfordMetrics, UK), the latter being the reference system. For each kinematic outcome, the validity of the Kinect was assessed with ICC, linear regression and Bland & Altman plots. ResultsThe Kinect assesses trunk compensations, hand range of motion, movement time and mean velocity with a moderate to excellent reliability. In contrast, elbow and shoulder range of motion, time to peak velocity and path length ratio have a poor to moderate reliability, indicating that these variables should be interpreted with caution. Finally, instantaneous hand and elbow tracking are not precise enough to reliably assess Cartesian and angular kinematics over time, rendering variables such as the number of velocity peaks and the peak hand velocity unusable. ConclusionsThanks to its ease of use and markerless properties, the Kinect can be used in clinical routine for semi-automated quantitative diagnostics guiding individualised rehabilitation of the upper limb. However, engineers and therapists must bear in mind the limitations of the Kinect for the instantaneous tracking of the hand and elbow.