bioRxivEvolutionary BiologyPreprint
Fluctuating selection breaks Hamilton's rule for the evolution of altruism
Abstract
Altruistic behaviours, those that benefit recipients at a cost to donors, have long posed a puzzle in evolutionary biology and sociobiology. Established theories, such as kin selection, group selection, and reciprocal altruism, explain altruism via assortment mechanisms that depend on preferential interactions among altruists to ensure a higher average payoff than selfish individuals. Hamiltons rule defines the minimum level of such assortative interactions required for altruism to evolve. However, in populations with limited growth, increased competition can erode the selective advantage of altruism and thus require more stringent Hamiltons rule. Here, we propose a fundamentally different mechanism: fluctuating selection driven by increased competition due to added social benefits of altruism in populations with limited carrying capacity. Under fluctuating selection, altruists can invade a selfish population without the need of assortment mechanisms and outcompete selfish individuals through a transient phase, even when the cost of altruism exceeds its direct benefit. Classical invasion analysis, which compares the long-term growth rates of rare altruistic mutants and resident selfish individuals, fails in our model because both strategies exhibit zero long-term growth. Instead, we show that altruism can invade when its short-term, time-averaging growth rate exceeds that of selfish individuals, which necessitates a prolonged transient phase. This invasion is enabled by payoff-regulated density dependence, which captures the dynamic interplay between payoff and density on fitness under fluctuating selection. Our findings challenge the necessity of Hamiltons rule and show that genuine altruism, with less average payoff than selfish individuals, even extremely self-sacrificial, can emerge under natural selection. This suggests that altruism may arise not from preferential interaction, but as an adaptive response to population fluctuations in constrained environments, providing an alternative paradigm for understanding the evolution of altruistic behaviour.
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Oblique Transmission, Conformity, and Preference in the Evolution of Altruism
K. K. Denton, Y. Ram, M. W. Feldman·bioRxiv·Dec 10, 2020
- Evolution of spite versus evolution of altruism through a disbandment mechanism
S. Kurokawa·bioRxiv·Jul 18, 2023
- Selection favors context-dependent bias in altruism
Linnéa M. Båvik, Rohan S. Mehta, Daniel B. Weissman·bioRxiv·Apr 29, 2026
- Survival cost sharing among altruistic full siblings in Mendelian population
József Garay, I. López, … Tamás F. Móri·BMC Ecology and EvolutionPeer-reviewed·Nov 18, 2024
- Linked selection and the evolution of altruism in family-structured populations
L. Thomson, D. A. Priego Espinosa, … J. Van Cleve·bioRxiv·May 15, 2022
- The evolution of public goods altruism
Florian Labourel, Philip G. Madgwick, … Jason B. Wolf·bioRxiv·Dec 11, 2025