bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Effect of analytical variability in estimating EEG-based functional connectivity
Sahar AllouchiD, Aya KabbaraiD, Joan DupreziD, Véronique PabaniD, Mohamad Ali KhaliliD, Julien ModoloiD, Mahmoud HassaniD
Abstract
The significant degree of variability and flexibility in neuroimaging analysis approaches has recently raised concerns. When running any neuroimaging study, the researcher is faced with a large number of methodological choices, often made arbitrarily. This can produce substantial variability in the results, ultimately hindering research replicability, and thus, robust conclusions. Here, we addressed the analytical variability in the EEG source connectivity pipeline and its effects on outcomes consistency. Like most neuroimaging analyses, the EEG source connectivity analysis involves the processing of high-dimensional data and is characterized by a complex workflow that leads to high analytical variability. In this study, we focused on source functional connectivity variability induced by three key factors along the analysis pipeline: 1) number of EEG electrodes, 2) inverse solution algorithms, and 3) functional connectivity metrics. Outcomes variability was assessed in terms of group-level consistency, inter-, and intra-subjects similarity, using resting-state EEG data (n = 88). As expected, our results showed that different choices related to the number of electrodes, source reconstruction algorithm, and functional connectivity measure substantially affect group-level consistency, between-, and within-subjects similarity. We believe that the significant impact of such methodological variability represents a critical issue for neuroimaging studies that should be prioritized. HighlightsO_LIThe significant impact of methodological variability is a recognized critical priority issue for neuroimaging studies. C_LIO_LIAnalytical variability related to the number of electrodes, source reconstruction algorithm, and functional connectivity measure is a prominent issue in the EEG source connectivity analysis. C_LIO_LIGroup-level consistency, between-, and within-subjects similarity are substantially affected by analytical variability in the EEG source connectivity analysis. C_LI
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: dimensionality reduction
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 2
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Consistency of EEG source localization and connectivity estimates
Keyvan Mahjoory, Vadim V. Nikulin, … Stefan Haufe·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Mar 12, 2017
- Effect of channel density, inverse solutions and connectivity measures on EEG resting-state networks: a simulation study
Sahar Allouch, Aya Kabbara, … Mahmoud Hassan·bioRxiv·Jun 1, 2022
- Successful reproduction of a large EEG study across software packages
Aya Kabbara, Nina Forde, … Mahmoud Hassan·Neuroimage ReportsPeer-reviewed·May 27, 2023
- Numerical Uncertainty in Analytical Pipelines Lead to Impactful Variability in Brain Networks
Gregory Kiar, Yohan Chatelain, … Tristan Glatard·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Nov 1, 2021
- Subject, session and task effects on power, connectivity and network centrality: a source-based EEG study
S. M. Pani, M. Ciuffi, … M. Fraschini·bioRxiv·Jun 18, 2019
- Moving Beyond Processing and Analysis-Related Variation in Neuroscience
Xinhui Li, Nathália Bianchini Esper, … Michael Peter Milham·Nature Human BehaviourPeer-reviewed·Aug 5, 2024