bioRxivEcology
Variations in terrestrial arthropod DNA metabarcoding methods recovers robust beta diversity but variable richness and site indicators based on exact sequence variants
T. M. Porter, D. M. Morris, N. Basiliko, M. Hajibabaei, D. Doucet, S. Bowman, E. J. S. Emilson, C. E. Emilson, D. Chartrand, K. Wainio-Keizer, A. Seguin, L. Venier
Abstract
Terrestrial arthropod fauna have been suggested as a key indicator of ecological integrity in forest systems. Because phenotypic identification is expert-limited, a shift towards DNA metabarcoding could improve scalability and democratize the use of forest floor arthropods for biomonitoring applications. The objective of this study was to establish the level of field sampling and DNA extraction replication needed for soil arthropod biodiversity assessments. Processing individually collected field samples recovered significantly higher richness (539-596 ESVs) than pooling the same number of field samples (126-154 ESVs), and we found no significant richness differences when using 1 or 3 pooled DNA extractions. Variations in the number of individual or composite samples or DNA extractions resulted in similar sample clustering based on community dissimilarities. Though our ability to identify taxa to species rank was limited, we were able to use arthropod COI metabarcodes from forest soil to assess richness, distinguish among sites, and recover site indicators based on unnamed exact sequence variants. Our results highlight the need to continue DNA barcoding of local taxa during COI metabarcoding studies to help build reference databases. All together, these sampling considerations support the use of soil arthropod COI metabarcoding as a scalable method for biomonitoring.
- assay: metagenomics
- research focus: ecology & biodiversity
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: database / resource
- approach: experimental assay
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Is there a fly in my soup? To what extent do metabarcoding and individual barcoding tell the same story?
Brendan Furneaux, Tomas V. Roslin, … Otso Ovaskainen·Molecular Ecology ResourcesPeer-reviewed·Sep 11, 2026
- Surveying Tropical Faunal Diversity via Airborne DNA Analyses
Joseph M. Craine, Nicholas O. Schulte, … Noah Fierer·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Oct 21, 2025
- Message in a Bottle, Metabarcoding Enables Biodiversity Comparisons Across Ecoregions
D. Steinke, S. L. deWaard, … P. D. N. Hebert·bioRxiv·Jul 5, 2021
- Establishing insect community composition using metabarcoding of soil samples, and preservative ethanol and homogenate from Malaise trap catches: surprising inconsistencies between methods.
D. Marquina, R. Esparza-Salas, … F. Ronquist·bioRxiv·Apr 2, 2019
- Non-destructive DNA metabarcoding of arthropods using collection medium from passive traps
Lucas Sire, Paul Schmidt Yáñez, … Carlos López‐Vaamonde·bioRxiv·Feb 7, 2023
- Use of massive DNA barcoding to monitor biodiversity: a test on forest soil macrofauna
Franck Jabot, Gwenaëlle Auger, … Julien Pottier·Forest Ecology and ManagementPeer-reviewed·Jul 22, 2025