PLoS ONENeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
MELD: Mixed Effects for Large Datasets
Abstract
Mixed effects models provide significant advantages in sensitivity and flexibility over typical statistical approaches to neural data analysis, but mass univariate application of mixed effects models to large neural datasets is computationally intensive. Threshold free cluster enhancement also provides a significant increase in sensitivity, but requires computationally-intensive permutation-based significance testing. Not surprisingly, the combination of mixed effects models with threshold free cluster enhancement and nonparametric permutation-based significance testing is currently completely impractical. With mixed effects for large datasets (MELD) we circumvent this impasse by means of a singular value decomposition to reduce the dimensionality of neural data while maximizing signal. Singular value decompositions become unstable when there are large numbers of noise features, so we precede it with a bootstrap-based feature selection step employing threshold free cluster enhancement to identify stable features across subjects. By projecting the dependent data into the reduced space of the singular value decomposition we gain the power of a multivariate approach and we can greatly reduce the number of mixed effects models that need to be run, making it feasible to use permutation testing to determine feature level significance. Due to these innovations, MELD is much faster than an element-wise mixed effects analysis, and on simulated data MELD was more sensitive than standard techniques, such as element-wise t-tests combined with threshold-free cluster enhancement. When evaluated on an EEG dataset, MELD identified more significant features than the t-tests with threshold free cluster enhancement in a comparable amount of time.
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: statistical model
- approach: matrix factorization
- Citations
- 5
- FWCI
- 0.57
- Field percentile
- top 24%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- lmeEEG: Mass linear mixed-effects modeling of EEG data with crossed random effects
Antonino Visalli, Maria Montefinese, … Ettore Ambrosini·Journal of Neuroscience MethodsPeer-reviewed·Oct 24, 2023
- MEG/EEG group study with MNE: recommendations, quality assessments and best practices
Mainak Jas, Eric Larson, … Alexandre Gramfort·Frontiers in NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Aug 6, 2018
- Low-Density EEG for Neural Activity Reconstruction Using Multivariate Empirical Mode Decomposition
Andrés Felipe Soler, Pablo A. Muñoz-Gutiérrez, … Marta Molinas·Frontiers in NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Feb 28, 2020
- Does Data Cleaning Improve Brain State Classification?
Steven L. Meisler, Michael J. Kahana, Youssef Ezzyat·bioRxiv·Jul 12, 2019
- Comparing Methods for Mass Univariate Analyses of Human EEG: Empirical Data and Simulations
Anna‐Lena Tebbe, Christian Panitz, Andreas Keil·Journal of Neuroscience MethodsPeer-reviewed·Nov 21, 2025
- A perceptual decision making EEG/fMRI data set
Yasmin Kim Georgie, Camillo Porcaro, … Dirk Ostwald·bioRxiv·Jan 25, 2018