Characterizing semantic compositions in the brain: A model-driven fMRI re-analysis
Marco CiapparelliiD, Marco MarelliiD, William W. GravesiD, Carlo ReverberiiD
Abstract
Semantic composition allows us to construct complex meanings (e.g., "dog house", "house dog") from simpler constituents ("dog", "house"). So far, neuroimaging studies have mostly relied on high-level contrasts (e.g., meaningful > non-meaningful phrases) to identify brain regions sensitive to semantic composition. However, such an approach is less apt at addressing how composition is carried out, namely what functions best characterize the integration of constituent concepts. To address this limitation, we rely on simple computational models to explicitly characterize alternative compositional operations, and use representational similarity analysis to compare the representations of models to those of target regions of interest within the general semantic network. To better target composition beyond specific task demands, we re-analyze fMRI data aggregated from four published studies (N = 85), all employing two-word combinations but differing in task requirements. Converging evidence from confirmatory and exploratory analyses reveals compositional representations in the pars triangularis of the left inferior frontal gyrus (BA45), even when analyses are restricted to a subset where the task did not require participants to actively engage in semantic processing. These results suggest that BA45 represents combinatorial information automatically across task demands, and further characterize these combinatorial representations as resulting from the (symmetric) intersection of constituent features. Additionally, a cluster of compositional representations emerges in the left middle superior temporal sulcus, while semantic, but not compositional, representations are observed in the left angular gyrus. Overall, our work clarifies which brain regions represent semantic information compositionally across different contexts and task demands, and qualifies which operations best describe composition.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Differential contributions of left-hemispheric language regions to basic semantic composition
Astrid Graessner, Emiliano Zaccarella, Gesa Hartwigsen·Brain Structure and FunctionPeer-reviewed·Jan 30, 2021
- The Neural Consequences of Semantic Composition
Heather Bruett, Marc N. Coutanche·Journal of Cognitive NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Sep 30, 2025
- Disentangling Semantic Composition and Semantic Association in the Left Temporal Lobe
Jixing Li, Liina Pylkkänen A·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jun 15, 2021
- An attempt to replicate a dissociation between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension reported by Dapretto & Bookheimer (1999, Neuron)
Matthew Siegelman, Zachary Mineroff, … Evelina G. Fedorenko·bioRxiv·Feb 22, 2017
- Functional MRI Investigation on Paradigmatic and Syntagmatic Lexical Semantic Processing
Songsheng Ying, Sabine Ploux·bioRxiv·Jan 11, 2020
- Distinct cortical patches for syntactic and semantic composition in the human brain
Thomas Dighiero-Brecht, Naama Friedmann, … Stanislas Dehaene·bioRxiv·Jun 18, 2026