Frontiers in NeuroinformaticsBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
CoBeL-RL: A neuroscience-oriented simulation framework for complex behavior and learning
Nicolas DiekmanniD, Sandhiya VijayabaskaraniD, Xiangshuai ZengiD, David KappeliD, Matheus Chaves MenezesiD, Sen ChengiD
Abstract
Reinforcement learning (RL) has become a popular paradigm for modeling animal behavior, analyzing neuronal representations, and studying their emergence during learning. This development has been fueled by advances in understanding the role of RL in both the brain and artificial intelligence. However, while in machine learning a set of tools and standardized benchmarks facilitate the development of new methods and their comparison to existing ones, in neuroscience, the software infrastructure is much more fragmented. Even if sharing theoretical principles, computational studies rarely share software frameworks, thereby impeding the integration or comparison of different results. Machine learning tools are also difficult to port to computational neuroscience since the experimental requirements are usually not well aligned. To address these challenges we introduce CoBeL-RL, a closed-loop simulator of complex behavior and learning based on RL and deep neural networks. It provides a neuroscience-oriented framework for efficiently setting up and running simulations. CoBeL-RL offers a set of virtual environments, e.g. T-maze and Morris water maze, which can be simulated at different levels of abstraction, e.g. a simple gridworld or a 3D environment with complex visual stimuli, and set up using intuitive GUI tools. A range of RL algorithms, e.g. Dyna-Q and deep Q-network algorithms, is provided and can be easily extended. CoBeL-RL provides tools for monitoring and analyzing behavior and unit activity, and allows for fine-grained control of the simulation via interfaces to relevant points in its closed-loop. In summary, CoBeL-RL fills an important gap in the software toolbox of computational neuroscience.
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: software / tool
- approach: deep learning
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 14
- FWCI
- 1.32
- Field percentile
- top 19%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Brain-like neural dynamics for behavioral control develop through reinforcement learning
Olivier Codol, Nanda H. Krishna, … Matthew G. Perich·bioRxiv·Oct 4, 2024
- A theory of cerebellar learning as a spike-based reinforcement learning in continuous time and space
Rin Kuriyama, Hideyuki Yoshimura, Tadashi Yamazaki·PNAS NexusPeer-reviewed·Sep 18, 2025
- Within and across-trial dynamics of human EEG reveal cooperative interplay between reinforcement learning and working memory
Anne Gabrielle Eva Collins, Michael J. Frank·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Feb 20, 2018
- Tracking and optimizing human performance using deep reinforcement learning in closed-loop behavioral- and neurofeedback: a proof of concept
Martin Dinov, Robert Leech·bioRxiv·Nov 28, 2017
- Closed-loop control of in vitro neuronal activity using reinforcement learning after in silico pre-training
Eduardo Alvares de Carvalho, José C. Mateus, … Paulo Aguiar·bioRxiv·Jul 20, 2026
- A reinforcement learning based software simulator for motor brain-computer interfaces
Ken-Fu Liang, Jonathan C. Kao·bioRxiv·Nov 25, 2024